[INDOLOGY] Question on amākṣika madhu in MBh 5.62.23

[KORN Agnes]

Dear all, 

I've heard of the project in Thailand, to the extent, that FAN Jingjing (department of South Asian Studies of Peking University), who will come to Paris hopefully at the end of this month or so, is one of the people working on it. So it does seem seem serious. 

Best, 
Agnes 


De: "Charles DiSimone via INDOLOGY" <indology at list.indology.info> 
À: "Dan Lusthaus" <yogacara at gmail.com> 
Cc: "Indology" <indology at list.indology.info> 
Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Septembre 2026 10:22:49 
Objet: Re: [INDOLOGY] Question on amākṣika madhu in MBh 5.62.23 

Dear Dan, 

Not to hijack the thread but your comment about the Rhys-Davids translations being a century old bring to mind a news blurb I recently read about a new Tripiṭaka translation coming out of Thailand: 
[ https://www.khaosodenglish.com/featured/2026/09/12/thailand-moves-ahead-with-45-volume-english-tipitaka-project/ | https://www.khaosodenglish.com/featured/2026/09/12/thailand-moves-ahead-with-45-volume-english-tipitaka-project/ ] 
(I know nothing about this venture beyond the above article) 

Friendly greetings, 
Charles 

Prof. Dr. Charles DiSimone 
Associate Professor of Buddhist Studies & Indology 
Department of Languages and Cultures 
Ghent University 


On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 5:34 AM Dan Lusthaus via INDOLOGY < [ mailto:indology at list.indology.info | indology at list.indology.info ] > wrote: 




You may want to look at the Agañña sutta, #27 in the Dīgha Nikāya. That sutta contains a cosmogonic myth about how rarified beings early in the world cycle became increasingly cruder, starting with the flowing essence of earth gelling into something like the skin that forms on milk when on is cooking it. It is the color of ghee or butter and sweet like the honey that bees make. But it is not made by bees. When they eat and enjoy it, their bodies and habit become more course and their life spans shorten. The vocabulary is not the same as the Mahābhāratā passage, but the idea is. 
The Pāli text can be read online here: [ https://suttacentral.net/dn27/pli/ms | https://suttacentral.net/dn27/pli/ms ] 

The T.W. Rhys-Davids translation (roughly a century old now) is online here [ https://suttacentral.net/dn27/en/tw-caf_rhysdavids | https://suttacentral.net/dn27/en/tw-caf_rhysdavids ] 

Good luck, 
Dan 


BQ_BEGIN

On Sep 16, 2026, at 11:27 AM, Martin Straube via INDOLOGY < [ mailto:indology at list.indology.info | indology at list.indology.info ] > wrote: 



BQ_BEGIN

Dear Patrick, 

One meight assume that it means "free from bees", "not contaminated with (dead) bees"; cf. Skt. nirmakṣika ( [ https://nws.uzi.uni-halle.de/ | https://nws.uzi.uni-halle.de ] ). However, In this case one would rather expect amakṣika. Did you check the critical edition of the Mbh? 

Best wishes 
Martin Straube 


patrick mccartney via INDOLOGY < [ mailto:indology at list.indology.info | indology at list.indology.info ] > schrieb am Mittwoch, 16. September 2026 um 08:44: 
BQ_BEGIN
Dear Friends, 

I'm curious about amākṣika in the following passage of the Mahābhārata: 
BQ_BEGIN
vayaṃ kirātaiḥ sahitā gacchāmo girim uttaram 
brāhmaṇair devakalpaiś ca vidyājambhakavātikaiḥ 

kuñjabhūtaṃ giriṃ sarvam abhito gandhamādanam 
dīpyamānauṣadhigaṇaṃ siddhagandharvasevitam 

tatra paśyāmahe sarve madhu pītam amākṣikam 
maruprapāte viṣame niviṣṭaṃ kumbhasaṃmitam 

āśīviṣair rakṣyamāṇaṃ kuberadayitaṃ bhṛśam 
yat prāśya puruṣo martyo 'maratvaṃ nigacchati 

acakṣur labhate cakṣur vṛddho bhavati vai yuvā 
iti te kathayanti sma brāhmaṇā jambhasādhakāḥ. 

BQ_END
The usual interpretation seems to be a-mākṣika “not bee-derived,” but I am wondering whether there is more to the terminology. Madhu has a much wider semantic range than simply “honey,” including Soma, sweet/intoxicating liquids, nectar, etc.; moreover, the passage places the madhu immediately after a description of medicinal plants and has it guarded by venomous snakes before attributing to it rejuvenating and immortalizing powers. 

There are also parallel passages: 
BQ_BEGIN
amākṣikaṃ mahāvīryaṃ puṭake puṭake madhu 
Kūrmapurāṇa 1.27.33; Liṅgapurāṇa 1.39.28 

BQ_END
and: 
BQ_BEGIN
vṛkṣāṃs tān paryagṛhṇanta madhu cāmākṣikaṃ balāt 
Kūrmapurāṇa 1.27.35 

BQ_END
Could amākṣika have a technical/material sense beyond “non-bee honey”? I am particularly interested in whether there are relevant commentarial, lexical, medical, or śleṣa/saṃdhyābhāṣā interpretations. 

All the best, 
Patrick McCartney, PhD 
Hiroshima, Japan 

BQ_END


BQ_END


BQ_END


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20260918/7659ea04/attachment.htm>