[INDOLOGY] a question about the āśīrliṅ
Christophe Vielle
christophe.vielle at uclouvain.be
Tue Mar 24 11:14:11 UTC 2026
I add the relevant pages from Robert Antoine, A Sanskrit Manual for High Schools, Part II, Calcutta : St. Xavier’s College, 1954, § 143 (a good scan, in several parts, of the whole manual, 1st ed., is available here: http://www.synec-doc.be/ragalalit/priv/Manuel_Antoine/ with Id = Lalit, pw = komalRe — at least for the time being, as the person who manages this directory and who once copied my exemplar is quite old now).
Le 24 mars 2026 à 11:16, Christophe Vielle <christophe.vielle at uclouvain.be> a écrit :
Note that
• Paradigms of verbs in the āśīrliṅ middle voice are given by O. K. Munshi, Dhāturūpaprapañca, ed. N. V. P. Unithiri, Calicut Sanskrit Series no. 25, 2 vols (part I-II), 2004/2006.
• In some of the available eds of the Siddharūpa, an indigenous popular elementary grammar which is a mere listing of paradigms, forms in the āśīrliṅ middle voice are given for EDH-, DHVAṂS-, ŚĪ-, HAN- , DHĀ- etc. - see Siddharūpaṃ, ed. Proph. Ār. Rāmarājavarmma [Prof. R. Ramarajavarma], Mullakkal (Alappuzha) : Vidyarambham Press, 2010 (20132), and ed. Kāṇippayyūr Paramēśvaran Nampūtirippāṭ, Kunnankulam (Thrissur): Panchangam Press, 20132 (20071).
• In Hanxleden's Grammatica Grandonica<https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/6251/file/hanxleden_grammatica.pdf>, forms of the "imperativum optativum permissivum 3tium" are provided accordingly, in the the middle voice ("deponentium"):
3 S
edhiṣīṣṭa
pakṣīṣṭa, dhvaṃsiṣīṣṭa, vyāsīṣṭa, saviṣīṣṭa, mr̥ṣīṣṭa,
mukṣīṣṭa, mukṣīyāstāṃ, etc.,
corayiṣīṣṭa, pālayiṣīṣṭa, arccayiṣīṣṭa, natsīṣṭa
3 D
edhiṣīyāstāṃ
3 P
edhiṣīran
2 S
edhiṣīṣṭhāḥ
2 D
edhiṣīyāsthāṃ
2 P
edhiṣīddhvaṃ
1 S
edhiṣīya
1 D
edhiṣīvahi
1 P
edhiṣīmahi
________________________________
3 S
hāsīṣṭa
variṣīṣṭa
grahiṣīṣṭa
ut edhiṣīṣṭa
3 S
bhukṣīṣṭa
yukṣīṣṭa
dhāsīṣṭa
śayiṣīṣṭa
ut edhiṣīṣṭa
3 S
maniṣīṣṭa
kr̥ṣīṣṭa
ceṣīṣṭa
aśiṣīṣṭa
vakṣīṣṭa
Item akṣīṣṭa
3 S
āvadhiṣīṣṭa
addhyaiṣīṣṭa, addhyāyiṣīṣṭa
3 S
vadhiṣīṣṭa
eṣīṣṭa
addhyaiṣīṣṭa
________________________________
but also in the passive :
anubhāviṣīṣṭa
edhiṣīṣṭa
pakṣīṣṭa
nandiṣīṣṭa
vyāyiṣīṣṭa, vyāṣīṣṭa
natsīṣṭa
tatsīṣṭa
deviṣīṣṭa
mukṣīṣṭa
coriṣīṣṭa, corayiṣīṣṭa
pālayiṣīṣṭa, pāliṣīṣṭa
arccayiṣīṣṭa, arcciṣīṣṭa
atsīṣṭa
rutsīṣṭa
bhukṣīṣṭa
yukṣīṣṭa
abhiṣāviṣīṣṭa, abhiṣoṣīṣṭa
niścāyiṣīṣṭa, niśceṣīṣṭa
taniṣīṣṭa
vakṣīṣṭa
kāriṣīṣṭa, kr̥ṣīṣṭa
krāyiṣīṣṭa, kreṣīṣṭa
grāhiṣīṣṭa, graṣīṣṭa
dhāsīṣṭa
hāviṣīṣṭa, hoṣīṣṭa
ddhvaṃsiṣīṣṭa
prasāviṣīṣṭa, prasoṣīṣṭa, prasavaṣīṣṭa
māriṣīṣṭa, mr̥ṣīṣṭa
hāyiṣīṣṭa, hāṣīṣṭa
vāriṣīṣṭa, variṣīṣṭa
śayiṣīṣṭa
maniṣīṣṭa
akṣīṣṭa
________________________________
and other derivative conjugations :
Verba significantia copiam
bobhūyiṣīṣṭa
bw
Christophe
Le 22 mars 2026 à 23:34, Robert P. GOLDMAN via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info> a écrit :
Sally Sutherland Goldman and I also make some mention of the form in our widely used Devavāṇīpraveṣikā: An Introduction to the Sanskrit Language, although we do not go into it in g=any details for beginning students.
Dr. R.P. Goldman
William and Catherine Magistretti Professor of Sanskrit Emeritus
and
Professor in the Graduate School
Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies
The University of California at Berkeley
On Mar 22, 2026, at 8:50 AM, Herman Tull via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
I recall it being taught (by the late Prof. Edwin Gerow) in a second year Sanskrit course (nearly a half-century ago!) with the delightful appellation of the "rare precative." I found this expression amusing; after all, one would expect something called the "precative" to be less than common, to say the least.
Herman Tull, PhD
Princeton, NJ
On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 8:35 AM Uskokov, Aleksandar via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>> wrote:
The benedictive is taught in Deshpande. In my teaching practice at an American university, student will not be introduced to it in the introductory course, along with other rare forms like the passive of the aorist; they WILL learn in when first encountered in a text, which is likely to happen in high intermediate, for instance in a course on Vedic, or advanced Sanskrit.
Best wishes
Aleksandar
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces at list.indology.info<mailto:indology-bounces at list.indology.info>> on behalf of Walter Slaje via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 8:16:58 AM
To: Matthew Kapstein <mattkapstein at proton.me<mailto:mattkapstein at proton.me>>
Cc: Indology List <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] a question about the āśīrliṅ
Inspired by David Reigle’s insightful article, which suggests that it is unlikely to encounter the benedictive in Sanskrit programs at (presumably American?) universities,* I decided to browse through some German-language textbooks.
The benedictive mood is evidently taught there, but most thoroughly by Bühler.** He, in turn, draws on Kielhorn’s grammar, where the rules of benedictive formations are described in great detail (§§ 380–385).***
What is interesting here, particularly regarding the question of whether vīkṣīṣīraṃs could be a variant worth considering at all, is that both authors explicitly point out that the interposed vowel of seṭ-roots in the Ātmanepada appears as a long -ī- exclusively in formations from the root grah (e.g., grahīṣīṣṭa), but must otherwise always be short (Kielhorn § 382c; Bühler p. 95, 20).
As if to confirm Riegle’s observation regarding the exclusion of the benedictive from English-language Sanskrit programs and textbooks, Perry—who otherwise bases his textbook strictly on Bühler and follows him even in the exercises****—also excludes any treatment of the benedictive with the following words:
“[...] it is so rare that its formation need not be explained here.” (p. 188).
As said, this is merely an observation regarding trends in Sanskrit textbooks from different scholarly traditions.
Regards,
WS
*
“It is possible to go through university Sanskrit programs without ever encountering the benedictive. […] Readings in classical Sanskrit texts typically follow this in the programs, so that unless one specifically takes up Pāṇinian grammar (or Vedic texts, where a few benedictives do occur), one is quite unlikely to encounter the benedictive.” (Reigle 1997, p. 127).
**
https://uvhw.de/studia-indologica/product/200922_08-228-8.html
***
https://uvhw.de/studia-indologica/product/200921_08-227-1.html
****
“The Primer [...] is based upon an excellent little work by Professor Georg Bühler of Vienna: Leitfaden für den Elementarcursus des Sanskrit, Vienna 1883. I became acquainted with this book while in Germany, and after using it with a class at Columbia College was convinced of its great practical value.” (Preface to the 1936 edition).
Am Fr., 20. März 2026 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>>:
Dear Harry,
I was following the text given by Amano:
Abhisamayālaṃkārakārikāśāstravivṛti by Haribhadra. Skt.
ed. Koei H. Amano, Kyoto: Heirakujishoten, 2000.
and consulting the earlier editions as well.
I think that the readings you find in GRETIL are simply typos and not genuine variants.
Matthew
Matthew T. Kapstein
Professor emeritus
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Associate
The University of Chicago Divinity School
Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
https://ephe.academia.edu/MatthewKapstein
https://vajrabookshop.com/product/the-life-and-work-of-auleshi/
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501716218/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-i/#bookTabs=1
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501771255/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-ii/#bookTabs=1
https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/60949
Sent with Proton Mail<https://proton.me/mail/home> secure email.
On Friday, March 20th, 2026 at 12:51 AM, Harry Spier <vasishtha.spier at gmail.com<mailto:vasishtha.spier at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear list members,
Matthew Kapstein and ( David Reigle using edition 1929 by Stcherbatsky and Obermiller) spell the word as vīkṣiṣīraṃs . Same text in GRETIL (different editions) spell it vīkṣīṣīraṃs and vīkṣiṣiraṃs
Are these misprints or alternate spellings in GRETIL? pratipatsīrann is spelled the same in these etexts
Matthew Kapstein and ( David Reigle)
sarvākārajñatāmārgaḥ śāsitrā yo'tra deśitaḥ|
dhīmanto vīkṣiṣīraṃs tam anālīḍhaṃ parair iti ||1||
smṛtau cādhāya sūtrārthaṃ dharmacaryāṃ daśātmikām |
sukhena pratipatsīrann ity ārambhaprayojanam ||2||
--------------------------
GRETIL abhisamayālaṃkaranāmaprajñāpāramitopadeśaśāstram
https://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/corpustei/transformations/html/sa_maitreyanAtha-abhisamayAlaMkaranAmaprajJApAramitopadezazAstra.htm
input by Christian Coseru (no source book given) has;
sarvākārajñatāmārgaḥ śāsitrā yo 'tra deśita /
dhīmantī vīkṣīṣīraṃstamanālīḍhaṃ parairiti // Abhs_1.1 //
smṛtau cādhāya sūtrārthaṃ dharmacaryā daśātmikā /
sūkhena pratipatsīrannityārambhaprayojanam // Abhs_1.2 //
--------------------------------------
GRETIL Abhisamayālaṃkāra https://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/corpustei/transformations/html/sa_abhisamayAlaMkAra.htm
Data entry: members of the Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Input Project
Based on the ed. by Ramsankar Tripathi: Abhisamayalankaravrttih Sphutartha.
Sarnath : Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies (CIHTS), 1977.
grānthārambhaprayojanam sarvākārajñatāmārgaḥ śāsitrā yo 'tra deśitaḥ /
dhīmanto vīkṣiṣiraṃstamanālīḍhaṃ parairiti // asa_1.2 //
smṛtau cādhāya sūtrārthaṃ dharmacaryāṃ daśātmikām /
sukhena pratipatsīrannityārambhaprayojanam // asa_1.3 //
Harry Spier
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 5:30 PM Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>> wrote:
Many thanks to all who replied on- and off-list. I am sorry that I was not aware of David Reigle's paper, addressing my query so precisely, beforehand, and I am grateful to him and to Asko Parpola for sharing it. Walter Slaje's helpful remarks lend some support to my thought that the benedictive form may have had an intentionally archaic nuance.
Matthew
Matthew T. Kapstein
Professor emeritus
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Associate
The University of Chicago Divinity School
Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
https://ephe.academia.edu/MatthewKapstein
https://vajrabookshop.com/product/the-life-and-work-of-auleshi/
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501716218/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-i/#bookTabs=1
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501771255/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-ii/#bookTabs=1
https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/60949
Sent with Proton Mail<https://proton.me/mail/home> secure email.
On Thursday, March 19th, 2026 at 3:39 PM, Asko Parpola <aparpola at gmail.com<mailto:aparpola at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Matthew, David Reigle ha written a paper (attached) on these very two occurrences of the benedictive.
With best wishes, Asko
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 11:39 AM Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>> wrote:
Dear friends,
In the opening verses (given below) of the Abhisamayālamkāra-śāstra (ASA), an important Mahāyāna Buddhist treatise (said to have been revealed to Asaṅga by the bodhisattva Maitreya), we find two instances of verbs that I take to be examples of “precatives” or “benedictives” (āśīrliṅ) in the middle voice (ātmanepāda) third person plural. Whitney (925) and Macdonell (150) both flatly state that the precative middle, though current in Vedic, does not occur in Classical Sanskrit. Renou (330-331) does not affirm this categorically, but suggests that the āśīrliṅ (without specifying voice) is commonly met with in kāvya and epigraphy, though unknown to Buddhist usage. Edgerton, BHS Grammar, has nothing at all to say about the āśīrliṅ, probably due to its absence in the corpus that he consulted, though the ASA is not in any case written in “hybrid” Sanskrit; its terminology is distinctly Buddhist, of course, but without peculiarly BHS grammatical forms.
Conze, in the vocabulary accompanying his summary translation of the ASA (SOR VI) offers no grammatical analysis, but treats vīkṣiṣīran as an aorist optative, “have been able to behold,” and pratipatsīran as a future optative, “will be able to make progress.” (It seems simpler to me to adopt a mildly benedictive reading of both, “that the wise may behold… and that they may easily master…”)
What I wish to ask the vyākaraṇa specialists, however, is whether I am correct to take these verbs as middle voice āśīrliṅ third person plural? And, if so, are there other instances, whether in Buddhist or non-Buddhist works, that similarly call into question Whitney and Macdonell’s assertions? I would welcome any other observations about this apparently unusual form that you may be able to share. In particular, I am wondering if it is plausible to take its use here as a deliberately archaizing gesture.
sarvākārajñatāmārgaḥ śāsitrā yo'tra deśitaḥ|
dhīmanto vīkṣiṣīraṃs tam anālīḍhaṃ parair iti ||1||
smṛtau cādhāya sūtrārthaṃ dharmacaryāṃ daśātmikām |
sukhena pratipatsīrann ity ārambhaprayojanam ||2||
with thanks in advance for your observations and insights,
Matthew
Matthew T. Kapstein
Professor emeritus
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Associate
The University of Chicago Divinity School
Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
https://ephe.academia.edu/MatthewKapstein
https://vajrabookshop.com/product/the-life-and-work-of-auleshi/
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501716218/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-i/#bookTabs=1
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501771255/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-ii/#bookTabs=1
https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/60949
Sent with Proton Mail<https://proton.me/mail/home> secure email.
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
--
Asko Parpola, aparpola at gmail.com<mailto:aparpola at gmail.com>
http://www.helsinki.academia.edu/AskoParpola
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
Dr. R.P. Goldman
William and Catherine Magistretti Professor of Sanskrit Emeritus
and
Professor in the Graduate School
Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies
The University of California at Berkeley
<DVP Title Pages 2019.pdf><āśiir liṅ.pdf>
–––––––––––––––––––
Christophe Vielle<https://www.uclouvain.be/en/people/christophe.vielle>
Louvain-la-Neuve
–––––––––––––––––––
Christophe Vielle<https://www.uclouvain.be/en/people/christophe.vielle>
Louvain-la-Neuve
[cid:5158b7d1-83b8-41fd-a160-1a7b5f9654f7 at eurprd03.prod.outlook.com]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20260324/7daa5df8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GraphiqueColl?-2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 69832 bytes
Desc: GraphiqueColl?-2.png
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20260324/7daa5df8/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Skr_Antoine_2-2 pp. 94-97.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 701271 bytes
Desc: Skr_Antoine_2-2 pp. 94-97.pdf
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20260324/7daa5df8/attachment.pdf>
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list