[INDOLOGY] Analogues to Anselm's Ontological Arguments in Indian Philosophy?

Tue Jun 25 10:17:01 UTC 2024

Dear Nagaraj,

This isn't entirely right, if I understand you correctly. Along with satyam of the Taittirīya satyam jñānam anantaṁ brahma (with ānandam), Sarvajñātman in his Saṅkṣepa-Śārīraka adds a number of essential positive properties of Brahman (some usual suspects as nitya, śuddha, mukta) that include asti. It isn't entirely clear to me why—there isn't an Anselmian concern—but unless it is entirely theological, i.e., unless he is looking at some Upaniṣad that mentions it as a characteristic of Brahman, I suspect that the Nyāya chain of astitvam -> jñeyatvam -> abhidheyatvam may be at the back of his mind, i.e., that being knowable and nameable is predicated on existing as something actual.

In his list asti is followed by advitīya, if I recall correctly. Now we can argue if this is an existential quantifier or not :)

Best wishes,
Aleksandar

Aleksandar Uskokov

Senior Lector and Associate Research Scholar

South Asian Studies Council and Department of Religious Studies, Yale University

203-432-1972 | aleksandar.uskokov at yale.edu

"The Philosophy of the Brahma-sutra: An Introduction"

       https://www.amzn.com/1350150002/

Office Hours Sign-up: https://calendly.com/aleksandar-uskokov

________________________________
From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces at list.indology.info> on behalf of Nagaraj Paturi via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 2:16 AM
To: Jeffery Long <dharmaprof108 at yahoo.com>
Cc: Indology <indology at list.indology.info>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Analogues to Anselm's Ontological Arguments in Indian Philosophy?

Dear Prof. Jeffrey Long,

'existence' , interestingly enough, is part of the contemporary neologisms in the discourse related to religion in the contemporary Indian languages.

Words aastka and naastika are the neologisms formed and in use as the Indian language replacements for 'theist' and 'atheist' of English.

But , as almost all in this group know, these two words  aastka and naastika were not in reference to the existence or no existence of God in the traditional Vaidika discourse.

asti and naasti,  in the traditional Vaidika discourse ,  refer to the existence and no existence of praamaanya for Sruti or existence or no existence of paralokas , svarga, naraka or mokshalokas (such as vaikuntha, goloka, kailaasa, manidveepa etc.)

The root sat for exist as found in the word satya is part of the debates within Vedanta about the satyatva or mithyaatva of the category called Jagat , but not about a category comparable to God.

Category comparable to God, or a category often conflated with or confused for God in the Vaidika darshanas including Vedanta, is " eeshvara ".

Classificational categories seshvara and nireeshvara used in reference to different Vaidika darshanas are not about the existence or no existence of  " eeshvara ". It is about whether the category of  " eeshvara ". is necessary to account for things , (entities, processes and relationships etc.)

Within Vedanta, brahman  and eeshvara , categories comparable to God, are not discussed for existence or no existence of the category/entity.

Another existence or no existence discussion within Bharatiya Darshanas seems to be around aatman and that is between Vedanta and an avaidika darshana, say  Baudha darshana . If anattaa is no existence of aatman,  then this can be seen to be around the question of existence.

In Vedanta, because of the equivalence of Brahman and aatman at a certain level, this, if it is actually around the existence or no existence of aatman,  can be seen to be, at least remotely, connected to the existence or no existence of a category comparable to God.

On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 9:47 PM Jeffery Long via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,

Forgive me if this question has already been raised at some point on this list.

Are any of you aware of arguments developed in Indian philosophical systems akin to the ontological arguments for the existence of God raised by St. Anselm? The closest thing I can think of is Śaṅkara’s argument that existence is self-evident.

With much gratitude in advance,

Jeff

Dr. Jeffery D. Long
Carl W. Zeigler Professor of Religion, Philosophy, & Asian Studies
School of Arts & Humanities
Elizabethtown College
Elizabethtown, PA

https://etown.academia.edu/JefferyLong

Series Editor, Explorations in Indic Traditions: Ethical, Philosophical, and Theological
Lexington Books

“One who makes a habit of prayer and meditation will easily overcome all difficulties and remain calm and unruffled in the midst of the trials of life.”  (Holy Mother Sarada Devi)

“We are a way for the Cosmos to know itself.” (Carl Sagan)

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

--
Nagaraj Paturi

Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
Dean, IndicA
BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
BoS Kavikulaguru Kalidasa Sanskrit University, Ramtek, Maharashtra
BoS Veda Vijnana Gurukula, Bengaluru.
Member, Advisory Council, Veda Vijnana Shodha Samsthanam, Bengaluru
Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies,
FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,
Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20240625/facf5518/attachment.htm>