[INDOLOGY] Highlights from the Sanskrit corpora

[Jonathan Silk]

I'm not able to engage in this in an informed manner (but did that stop me
before? ;), but, according to what I understand of Dominik's comment, the
editors of the Mbh could NOT claim copyright over the Skt text, *unless*
for instance they printed a conjecture in the text. If they simply (!!)
transcribe MSS, and delete some, over what could they claim copyright?
Because when I type out a text, I do not copy their font, formatting or
anything else, and I already mentioned that we were not talking about the
forematter, any editorial comments, notes etc. From a very technical point
of view, the work of the editors consisted of selecting preexisting text,
choosing what to print, and printing that. (Again, please, I'm not saying
that is what we really do, but I'm saying from the point of view of law
about creativity this seems to me the way it would be seen).
Anyway, thanks in part to the inspiration of Dominik I have been making
efforts as far as i am able to present all my own work in Open Access form
(but I have tenure and don't have to worry about being judged, I know
this). One example: the edition of the *Praśnottararatnamālikā* I recently
published in the IIJ is Open Access (but actually I try to post all my own
stuff online anyway... And I do not plan to publish any scholarly book in
the future that is not Open Access.)
Jonathan

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:14 AM Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Copyright is a slippery beast.  But the law is not *that* difficult in
> broad outline.
>
> What you say, Jonathan, about not being able to claim copyright over
> editions, is definitely wrong.  One can.  Authors, editors, and publishers
> do so all the time.  It's routinely printed on the back of the title page.
>
> There *is* a precedent of some sort specifically in German law that
> copyright on an edition expires after 25 years, and not the usual 60 or 70
> years after the death of the author.  Some other countries are looking at
> this German law and behaving accordingly.  See
> Margoni, Thomas and Perry, Mark, Scientific and Critical Editions of
> Public Domain Works: An Example of European Copyright Law
> (Dis)Harmonization (November 18, 2011). Canadian Intellectual Property
> Review, Vol. 27, p. 157. Available at SSRN:
> https://ssrn.com/abstract=1961535 (PDF)
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/mb8mc9rpsc1q2wb/Margoni%202011%20SSRN-id1961535.pdf?dl=0>
>
> But copyright inheres in all sorts of things.  So, a book contains text
> written by an author.  The author has copyright of that (unless they sign
> it away).  But the book also has a certain design, created by a book
> designer.  That may be subject to copyright, if it is particularly
> original.  Someone created the typeface and owns the copyright of that.  So
> you could get the author's permission to photocopy the book and the
> designer and typeface creators could still sue you for breach of their
> copyright.  It's all very vexing.
>
> In the case of the Mbh, I think there's a arguable case that BORI owns
> copyright of the text, but Prof. Tokunaga co-owns copyright of the
> electronic transcription.  Because he made something new and unique,
> especially by dividing compounds and so forth, thereby creatively adding
> original content.
>
> The Wikipedia page on Copyright <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright>and
> on infringement <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement>
> are good, incidentally.  As the latter page says,
>
> Shifting public expectations, advances in digital technology, and the
> increasing reach of the Internet have led to such widespread, anonymous
> infringement that copyright-dependent industries now focus less on pursuing
> individuals who seek and share copyright-protected content online, and more
> on expanding copyright law to recognize and penalize, as indirect
> infringers, the service providers and software distributors who are said to
> facilitate and encourage individual acts of infringement by others.
>
> So while it's unlikely that you personally would be pursued for putting
> the BORI Mbh on your website, the website maintainer or even hosting
> business might be pursued.
>
> Best,
> Dominik
>


-- 
J. Silk
Leiden University
Leiden University Institute for Area Studies, LIAS
Matthias de Vrieshof 3, Room 0.05b
2311 BZ Leiden
The Netherlands

copies of my publications may be found at
https://leidenuniv.academia.edu/JASilk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20191001/fb898853/attachment.htm>