[INDOLOGY] Sanskrit can tackle climate change

[Nagaraj Paturi]

Where did I say you (Prof. Camillo Formigatti) is wrong?

Where did I say, " yes, Sanskrit can tackle climate change?

Where did I say, " Sanskrit Literature can tackle climate change?



On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Camillo Formigatti <
camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear Nagaraj,
>
> Once again, I beg to differ. I asked a clear and simple question, namely
> whether Sanskrit can tackle climate change for real or not, and Dr Ruppel
> provided her own articulated answer. I then replied saying that I
> understand it so that Sanskrit cannot tackle this problem, to which you
> replied that I was wrong and that yes, Sanskrit can tackle climate change.
> After some other emails, Dr Ruppel agreed with me that Sanskrit literature
> can only help, as many other literatures, but not tackle this problem. The
> thread is there for everyone to be read.
>
> Now you say that Sanskrit literature can't tackle climate change. Which is
> your opinion? It's a simple question, to which I can give my simple answer,
> no it can't. I don't understand why you can't. I didn't ask whether
> Sanskrit literature contains passages which advocate respect for nature.
> Sure it does, again as most other literatures, even in the ancient world.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Camillo
>
> Sent from my Xperia by Sony smartphone
>
>
> ---- Nagaraj Paturi wrote ----
>
> Thanks, Prof. Camillo Formigatti , for agreeing that Sanskrit , like any
> language is not toxic.
>
> Yes, I am equally worried about climate change.
>
> Speaking Sanskrit can not tackle climate change.
>
> Using Sanskrit for any other form of communication such as writing in it
> can not tackle climate change.
>
> After diagnosing the roots of the Ecological Crisis in the 'modern'
> attitude of dominating or controlling nature (I need not quote any specific
> book or article here because there are plenty of them) and in the Christian
> attitude ( Lynn White's well discussed/debated famous/notorious article "
> Historical Roots of the Ecological Crisis) people turned towards
> traditional cultures from various places, countries etc. Many arrived at
> the conclusion that cultural diversity is key to biodiversity which is key
> to environmental health of the Earth. That India has been pro-diversity
> from millennia can not be disputed. It has been the opposite of the
> uniformity imposing messianic cultures. That literature in Sanskrit
> articulates the worldview contributing to the age old diversity in India is
> the point. In addition, Texts such as the Gita in Sanskrit have a very
> clear articulation of nature friendly attitude and following eco-cycle etc.
> as shown in my early post in the present thread. Of course, this kind of
> ideas can be found in some other texts in some other languages too. But
> this forum is not a forum of Egyptology to discuss similar ideas in ancient
> Egypt if there are any. Since  discussing Sanskrit is within the scope of
> the list, we are doing it here.
>
> I did not make a statement that Sanskrit can tackle climate change
> anywhere in the thread.
>
> When Prof. Ruppel said that in a certain specific sense, phrasing by the
> thread initiator can be justified, I agreed with her and said that I would
> have said the same.
>
> This book
> <https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Technology_and_Human_Destiny.html?id=9bbQAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y> and
> Myths of Science and Technology by the Mc Cormac by the same publisher
> discuss use of Indian worldview for a solution to ecological crisis.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Camillo Formigatti <
> camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Dear Nagaraj,
>>
>> I'm not interested to know about the supposed toxicity of Sanskrit, as I
>> don't think any language can be toxic.
>>
>> I am interested in the answer to the question whether Sanskrit can tackle
>> climate change or not, because I'm really very worried about climate
>> change. First you said it can, quoting Dr Ruppel to sustain your argument,
>> and now you say that the sentence "Sanskrit can tackle climate change"
>> cannot be used in a meaningful way. Does this mean then that Sanskrit
>> cannot tackle climate change? I confess I'm really confused now.
>>
>> Sent from my Xperia by Sony smartphone
>>
>>
>> ---- Nagaraj Paturi wrote ----
>>
>>
>> That was the phrasing by the thread initiator.
>>
>> Prof. Antonia Ruppel tried to give sense to it.
>>
>> It can not be meaningfully be used only as much as statements such as
>> "Sanskrit is toxic" or phrases such as  "toxicity of Sanskrit can not be.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:09 PM, Antonia Ruppel <rhododaktylos at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Camillo,
>>>
>>> > Still, Sanskrit can only *help* tackle, and not directly tackle
>>> climate change. Or am I wrong and 'Sanskrit literature and the ideas
>>> contained
>>> > therein' can tackle climate change? I thought only mankind can tackle
>>> it directly, but you are telling me I'm wrong.
>>>
>>> Yes, I agree fully, Sanskrit (literature and the ideas contained
>>> therein) can *help* tackle, and not directly tackle, issues such as
>>> climate change ni which a larger perspective is useful.
>>>
>>> To make it clear, in spite of the context I tried to give in my initial
>>> mail (which I still think is the aspect we *should* be focussing on to make
>>> this debate fruitful!), I do NOT think that the sentence
>>>
>>> 'Sanskrit can tackle climate change'
>>>
>>> can meaningfully be used as phrased.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>    Antonia
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 18:27, Camillo Formigatti <
>>> camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Still, Sanskrit can only *help* tackle, and not directly tackle
>>>> climate change. Or am I wrong and 'Sanskrit literature and the ideas
>>>> contained therein' can tackle climate change? I thought only mankind can
>>>> tackle it directly, but you are telling me I'm wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my Xperia by Sony smartphone
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---- Antonia Ruppel wrote ----
>>>>
>>>> In isolation, the sentence
>>>>
>>>> 'Sanskrit can tackle climate change'
>>>>
>>>> is like the sentence
>>>>
>>>> 'Doctors named Brian can prescribe antibiotics'
>>>>
>>>> The latter makes it sound as though it was something about specifically
>>>> doctors of this name that could do this, rather than just doctors in
>>>> general. The former makes it sound as though this was a property
>>>> specifically of Sanskrit, whereas it is a property of all literary cultures
>>>> - and I pointed out that by 'Sanskrit', we can only mean 'Sanskrit
>>>> literature and the ideas contained therein' rather than the Sanskrit
>>>> language.
>>>>
>>>> In Indian English, I often hear 'Sanskrit' used to mean exactly
>>>> 'Sanskrit literature and the ideas contained therein'. It would be more
>>>> helpful to reserve a term like Sanskriti for this even in English, and use
>>>> Sanskrit  (< saMskRt*a*-), for just the language. Otherwise it sounds as
>>>> though we, either mistakenly or intentionally, assign properties to the
>>>> Sanskrit language that it, as beautiful as it is, does not have.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>>     Antonia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 18:08, Camillo Formigatti via INDOLOGY <
>>>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Nagaraj,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I beg to differ. I quote from Dr Ruppel’s answer:
>>>>>
>>>>> “What is needed to tackle climate change is for people to live
>>>>> moderately and treat their environment (human and non-human) with respect,
>>>>> and for companies to do that even more so. […] *Sanskrit - the
>>>>> language - cannot help us with that. Sanskrit literature, and many other
>>>>> literatures and literary cultures all over the world,* present us
>>>>> with us with centuries and sometimes even millennia of careful thoughts on
>>>>> how to live happily without greed and with respect for others. There are
>>>>> many texts that furthermore encourage careful inquiry, i.e. the kind that
>>>>> is the necessary basis of climatological research. As such, knowledge of
>>>>> (some of) the thoughts presented to us by Sanskrit literature can indeed
>>>>> help us with climate change, as it can with many other aspects of our
>>>>> modern lives.” [emphasis mine]
>>>>>
>>>>> Bottom line, Sanskrit as a language cannot help us with climate change
>>>>> and some ideas expressed in Sanskrit literature, as well as in “many other
>>>>> literatures and literary cultures all over the world”, can help humankind
>>>>> in tackling climate change. This means that Sanskrit itself and not even
>>>>> Sanskrit literature can tackle climate change, as much as Henry David
>>>>> Thoreau’s books cannot either, because “[w]hat is needed to tackle climate
>>>>> change is for people to live moderately and treat their environment (human
>>>>> and non-human) with respect”, and not simply read Sanskrit texts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, am I wrong in this interpretation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Camillo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr Camillo A. Formigatti
>>>>>
>>>>> John Clay Sanskrit Librarian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bodleian Libraries
>>>>>
>>>>> The Weston Library
>>>>>
>>>>> Broad Street, Oxford
>>>>>
>>>>> OX1 3BG
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel. (office): 01865 (2)77208
>>>>> www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *GROW YOUR MIND*
>>>>>
>>>>> in Oxford University’s
>>>>>
>>>>> Gardens, Libraries and Museums
>>>>>
>>>>> www.mindgrowing.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Nagaraj Paturi <nagarajpaturi at gmail.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* 11 September 2018 17:23
>>>>> *To:* Camillo Formigatti <camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk>
>>>>> *Cc:* Indology <INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [INDOLOGY] Sanskrit can tackle climate change
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Prof. Antonia Ruppel -ji was very clear in saying that texts in
>>>>> Sanskrit can help human kind to tackle climate change. In that sense,
>>>>> Sanskrit can tackle climate change.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> can not ' was not used by her alongside Sanskrit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 9:45 PM Camillo Formigatti via INDOLOGY <
>>>>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks, you have provided an answer to my question. Basically,
>>>>> Sanskrit cannot tackle climate change, only humankind can. Or have I
>>>>> misunderstood something?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Camillo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr Camillo A. Formigatti
>>>>>
>>>>> John Clay Sanskrit Librarian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bodleian Libraries
>>>>>
>>>>> The Weston Library
>>>>>
>>>>> Broad Street, Oxford
>>>>>
>>>>> OX1 3BG
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel. (office): 01865 (2)77208
>>>>> www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *GROW YOUR MIND*
>>>>>
>>>>> in Oxford University’s
>>>>>
>>>>> Gardens, Libraries and Museums
>>>>>
>>>>> www.mindgrowing.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Nagaraj Paturi <nagarajpaturi at gmail.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* 10 September 2018 19:09
>>>>> *To:* Antonia Ruppel <rhododaktylos at gmail.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* Camillo Formigatti <camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk>;
>>>>> Jonathan Silk <kauzeya at gmail.com>; Indology <
>>>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [INDOLOGY] Sanskrit can tackle climate change
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Prof. Antonia Ruppel.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We have an expression in Hindi, आप मेरी मुह की बात छीन ली । You
>>>>> snatched words words from my mouth. meaning you said what I wanted to say.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You articulated it better than I would have.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Antonia Ruppel <
>>>>> rhododaktylos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Camillo, dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What I find most striking in these debates is the lack of
>>>>> definition/understanding of what people mean when they say 'Sanskrit'. The
>>>>> author of the article at the basis of this thread does not seem to have had
>>>>> a good idea of what they or the speakers they talk about were thinking of;
>>>>> as Nagaraj pointed out further down in this thread, Sanskrit *literature*
>>>>> contains numerous passages that might be relevant in the climate change
>>>>> debate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What is needed to tackle climate change is for people to live
>>>>> moderately and treat their environment (human and non-human) with respect,
>>>>> and for companies to do that even more so. What also is needed is research
>>>>> that leads to understanding of what the factors are that are the most
>>>>> damaging to the environment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sanskrit - the language - cannot help us with that. Sanskrit
>>>>> literature, and many other literatures and literary cultures all over the
>>>>> world, present us with us with centuries and sometimes even millennia of
>>>>> careful thoughts on how to live happily without greed and with respect for
>>>>> others. There are many texts that furthermore encourage careful inquiry,
>>>>> i.e. the kind that is the necessary basis of climatological research. As
>>>>> such, knowledge of (some of) the thoughts presented to us by Sanskrit
>>>>> literature can indeed help us with climate change, as it can with many
>>>>> other aspects of our modern lives.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, understood in this very specific way, yes, Sanskrit can help us
>>>>> tackle climate change.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But to phrase it in this stand-alone way is misleading: knowledge of
>>>>> the thoughts people have thought in the past, of the ways in which people
>>>>> in the past have dealt with very human problems, and of the ways in which
>>>>> those problems actually remain very relevant today: this is what helps us
>>>>> deal with climate change (among other things).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So up with Sanskrit scholarship, up with ALL the humanities! We just
>>>>> need to make this point more clearly and probably more repeatedly; maybe
>>>>> then they'll stop cutting our funding.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>
>>>>>       Antonia
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 17:12, Camillo Formigatti via INDOLOGY <
>>>>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Nagaraj and colleagues,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I followed with great interest this discussion, but I still can’t
>>>>> decide whether Sanskrit can tackle climate change for real or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you all think? Because if this is true, we should all plead
>>>>> for the use of Sanskrit to stop one of the greatest challenges for
>>>>> humankind and many other living beings.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cammillo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr Camillo A. Formigatti
>>>>>
>>>>> John Clay Sanskrit Librarian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bodleian Libraries
>>>>>
>>>>> The Weston Library
>>>>>
>>>>> Broad Street, Oxford
>>>>>
>>>>> OX1 3BG
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: camillo.formigatti at bodleian.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel. (office): 01865 (2)77208
>>>>> www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *GROW YOUR MIND*
>>>>>
>>>>> in Oxford University’s
>>>>>
>>>>> Gardens, Libraries and Museums
>>>>>
>>>>> www.mindgrowing.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Nagaraj Paturi <nagarajpaturi at gmail.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* 10 September 2018 12:04
>>>>> *To:* Jonathan Silk <kauzeya at gmail.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* George Thompson <gthomgt at gmail.com>; Indology <
>>>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [INDOLOGY] Sanskrit can tackle climate change
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >  I don't defend "German Indology" because I am German. I defend it
>>>>> because German Indology has been good Indology.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- If you defend German Indology because you are German, there is no
>>>>> anauchitya in it. You might be saying this to say that your statement
>>>>> German Indology is a good Indology is not a subjective or biased statement
>>>>> but an objective and unbiased one. that intention is well taken. But at the
>>>>> same time, reacting or responding to statements about our respective
>>>>> countries/nations as members of those nations has no anouchitya.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trying to appear as though we have overcame our love for our own
>>>>> individual prestige, prestige of our family, prestige of our educational
>>>>> institute of our affiliation, nation of our origin, nation of our current
>>>>> belonging etc. is unnecessary.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Expressions such as का ते कांता?  कस्ते पुत्रः ? suit a संन्यासी, a
>>>>> renounced ascetic , not a संसारी  , a family person. Within the
>>>>> reference frame of  संसारी ,  expressions such as का ते कांता?  कस्ते
>>>>> पुत्रः ? are not only anauchitya but even infidelity and treachery to
>>>>> that system. In Telugu there is an idiom meaning "dry Vedanta" used in
>>>>> reference to such usages of extreme level ascetic Vedanta used by family
>>>>> people with mundane interests.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Coming to the word German Indology, I must confess that my
>>>>> understanding of -logy of -logy in the case of Indology is not adavanced
>>>>> enough to distinctly identify German Indology from other strands of
>>>>> Indology. Prof.s Vishwa Adluri and Joydeep Bagchee even talk of German
>>>>> Indology of 18th and 19th centuries as their focus. That is too much of a
>>>>> minute nuance to my level of understanding. Some time ago, some people
>>>>> asked me to respond to their posts and responses to their posts. I
>>>>> responded to them saying that the issues such as antisemitism in German
>>>>> Indology (of 18th and 19th centuries) etc. raised by them are not studied
>>>>> by me so well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Later, a few months ago, I got the opportunity to meet the two
>>>>> professors in India. That was their talk on Mahabharata. They were doing a
>>>>> poorvapaksha of the view that Mahabharata is full of self-contradictions
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Antisemitism might look to be straw man used by the critiques of early
>>>>> or old German Indology to malign it using the Hitler, Nazis, genocide etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But 'Hinduism' and Indian nationalism have been greater victims of
>>>>> this straw man based on Hitler, Nazis and genocide because the symbol of
>>>>> swastika associated with 'Hinduism' and the word nationalism in Indian
>>>>> nationalism are repeatedly invoked to stereotype 'Hinduism', Indian
>>>>> nationalism etc. as fascist, Nazi-like, genocidal in tendency etc. The word
>>>>> German Indology is not popular beyond the readers of the publications of
>>>>> Profs Adluri and Bagchee. But the  repeated invoking of stereotypes of
>>>>> 'Hinduism', Indian nationalism etc. as fascist, Nazi-like, genocidal in
>>>>> tendency etc  is found almost everywhere including popular political
>>>>> discourse. Connection of German Indology with antisemitism may at least
>>>>> give an impression of being reasonable. But why Hinduism should be bad
>>>>> because Hitler used its sacred symbol or why Indian nationalism should be
>>>>> bad because Hitler and Nazis were 'nationalists' or because they used the
>>>>> unscientific racist term 'Aryan', is beyond the comprehension of any
>>>>> reasonable understanding.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Those knowledgeable in German Indology of 18th and 19th centuries and
>>>>> its connection or lack of it with antisemitism might discuss with Prof.s
>>>>> Adluri and Bagchee.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I for one, am not in a reference frame of  का ते कांता?  कस्ते पुत्रः ? or
>>>>> what your nation? , what my nation ? not to respond when I see that
>>>>> misrepresentation of Sanskrit, India and Indian culture is being done
>>>>> particularly by those who are viewed in India as those who chose  Sanskrit,
>>>>> India and Indian culture  as their subject matter out of love and respect
>>>>> for that subject matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Silk <kauzeya at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sorry if I was unclear: mine was not a plea to allow a certain
>>>>> viewpoint (please do not assume that because I use that term I think "there
>>>>> are always two sides to any issue" or make any other assumptions about my
>>>>> position or motivation)--mine was not a plea to allow a certain viewpoint;
>>>>> it was a plea NOT to introduce Trump into the Indology list, and to
>>>>> introduce Modi only insofar as his policies directly relate to Indology
>>>>> (Skt, Tamil, etc).
>>>>>
>>>>> I may well be astonishingly naive, that obviously is something of
>>>>> which I would be the least qualified judge. And astonishment is naturally
>>>>> an entirely subjective experience, so you are welcome to it. But please
>>>>> please let us keep politics off this list. [Again, simply to make overly
>>>>> clear: this does NOT mean that I think discussion of the theories
>>>>> concerning the MBh propounded by whomever are not fair game. Certainly they
>>>>> are, but just because, for instance, the authors of those theories engage
>>>>> in ad hominem attacks does not mean that the proper response is to respond
>>>>> in kind. "Racist" anything stands or falls on its own merits. [this is a
>>>>> different, although not entirely different, perhaps, issue than whether we
>>>>> should acknowledge and take into account the work of persons whose history
>>>>> is absolutely clear -- eg the studies of Wust, or I would venture to say,
>>>>> although foreign to most of the readers of the Indology list, the research
>>>>> of Miyamoto Shoson, who was an incredible Japanese imperialist--one of his
>>>>> prefaces celebrates the day the Imperial Japanese army entered India, the
>>>>> land of the Buddha's birth. This, to be as polite as possible, turns my
>>>>> stomach, but that does not solve the question whether I should, therefore,
>>>>> stop reading his book at the preface. [you might, all of you, take solace
>>>>> in the fact that this proves that at least one person reads prefaces!]]]
>>>>> (sorry, lost count of my embedded brackets!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, back to the point (there was one): I am far from the first
>>>>> person to notice that it hardly makes any sense at all to speak of "German"
>>>>> Indology in the first place, but whatever attacks are made against one
>>>>> approach or another, whether the nature of those attacks makes any sense is
>>>>> not to be determined by the motivation of the attacker. Let's sift the
>>>>> wheat from the chaff, and perhaps, after all, some ideas, even if published
>>>>> as scholarship, are not really worthwhile rebutting at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hoping earnestly that I have clarified my ideas, as poor and unhelpful
>>>>> as they may be,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:40 AM, George Thompson <gthomgt at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> re JOYDEEP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As long as you all allow this hindutva racist to post to this list, mr
>>>>> joydeep, who has regularly attacked "German Indology" over the years, then
>>>>> I will fight with you.  I don't defend "German Indology" because I am
>>>>> German. I defend it because German Indology has been good Indology.
>>>>> Joydeep's Indology is a racist Indology.  I think that Jonathan and Nagaraj
>>>>> are astonishingly naïve when it comes to Joydeep's ideology.  Have they
>>>>> read Joydeep's papers?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shame on you both!  Please read some of  Joydeep's papers, and then
>>>>> get back in touch with the rest of us.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Thompson
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> J. Silk
>>>>> Leiden University
>>>>>
>>>>> Leiden University Institute for Area Studies, LIAS
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias de Vrieshof 3
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Matthias+de+Vrieshof+3&entry=gmail&source=g>,
>>>>> Room 0.05b
>>>>>
>>>>> 2311 BZ Leiden
>>>>>
>>>>> The Netherlands
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> copies of my publications may be found at
>>>>>
>>>>> https://leidenuniv.academia.edu/JASilk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Nagaraj Paturi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BoS, Chinmaya Vishwavidyapeeth, Veliyanad, Kerala
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>>>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>>>>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>>>>> committee)
>>>>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options
>>>>> or unsubscribe)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr Antonia Ruppel
>>>>> www.cambridge-sanskrit.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Nagaraj Paturi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BoS, Chinmaya Vishwavidyapeeth, Veliyanad, Kerala
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>>>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>>>>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>>>>> committee)
>>>>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options
>>>>> or unsubscribe)
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>>>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>>>>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>>>>> committee)
>>>>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options
>>>>> or unsubscribe)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr Antonia Ruppel
>>>> www.cambridge-sanskrit.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr Antonia Ruppel
>>> www.cambridge-sanskrit.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nagaraj Paturi
>>
>> Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
>>
>>
>> BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
>>
>> BoS, Chinmaya Vishwavidyapeeth, Veliyanad, Kerala
>>
>> Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies
>>
>> FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,
>>
>> (Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nagaraj Paturi
>
> Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
>
>
> BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra
>
> BoS, Chinmaya Vishwavidyapeeth, Veliyanad, Kerala
>
> Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies
>
> FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,
>
> (Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )
>
>
>
>



-- 
Nagaraj Paturi

Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.


BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra

BoS, Chinmaya Vishwavidyapeeth, Veliyanad, Kerala

Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies

FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,

(Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20180912/658adec4/attachment.htm>