[INDOLOGY] Sandhi of word final n
Harry Spier
hspier.muktabodha at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 00:15:09 UTC 2018
Hi Madhav,
I think I'm still a little unclear.
I follow this for devān+tatra,
>
> In a sandhi sequence like devān+tatra, according to P 8.3.7
> (naśchavyapraśān), the word final n changes into ru,
>
which changes into visarga and ultimately into s.
>
I.e. if n is before ch, ṭh, th, c, ṭ, or t then n -> ru
devān+tatra -> devāru+tatra -> devāḥ+tatra -> devās+tatra
The vowel before the n becomes optionally nasalized by P 8.3.2
> (atrānunāsikaḥ pūrvasya tu vā), and in the alternative that it does not
> become nasalized, it is followed by an anusvāra by P.8.3.4 (anunāsikāt paro
> 'nusvāraḥ).
>
I.e. devās+tatra -> devāṁs+tatra, or devās+tatra with nasalized vowel
The rule P 8.3.36 (vā śari) says that a word-final visarga optionally
> remains a visarga before ś, ṣ, and s, while the Vārttika (kharpare śari vā
> lopo vaktavyaḥ) stipulates that if the following ś, ṣ and s are followed by
> a khaR sound (i.e. kh, ph, ch, ṭh, th, c, ṭ, t, k, p, ś, ṣ, or s, then the
> visarga is optionally deleted.
>
I.e. devāṁs+tatra -> devāṁs+tatra or devāṁ+tatra
You wrote:
> Your example अमुष्मिं स्तवे, and the observations of Whitney, MacDonell
> and Coulson seem to relate to the variation noted by these rules of Pāṇini
> and the Vārttika. There are quite a few options involved, and they reflect
> the variation in the usage.
>
I see how this applies to devān+tatra but I'm unclear how we get from
amuṣmin+ stave to amuṣmiṁ+stave since in this case the n is followed by s
and I don't see how rule 8.3.7 applies.
Thanks,
Harry Spier
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
> Hello Harry,
>
> In a sandhi sequence like devān+tatra, according to P 8.3.7
> (naśchavyapraśān), the word final n changes into ru, which changes into
> visarga and ultimately into s. The vowel before the n becomes optionally
> nasalized by P 8.3.2 (atrānunāsikaḥ pūrvasya tu vā), and in the alternative
> that it does not become nasalized, it is followed by an anusvāra by P.8.3.4
> (anunāsikāt paro 'nusvāraḥ). The rule P 8.3.36 (vā śari) says that a
> word-final visarga optionally remains a visarga before ś, ṣ, and s, while
> the Vārttika (kharpare śari vā lopo vaktavyaḥ) stipulates that if the
> following ś, ṣ and s are followed by a khaR sound (i.e. kh, ph, ch, ṭh, th,
> c, ṭ, t, k, p, ś, ṣ, or s, then the visarga is optionally deleted. Your
> example अमुष्मिं स्तवे, and the observations of Whitney, MacDonell and
> Coulson seem to relate to the variation noted by these rules of Pāṇini and
> the Vārttika. There are quite a few options involved, and they reflect the
> variation in the usage. Best,
>
> Madhav
>
> Madhav M. Deshpande
> Professor Emeritus
> Sanskrit and Linguistics
> University of Michigan
> [Residence: Campbell, California]
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 5:21 PM Harry Spier via INDOLOGY <
> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>
>> Dear list members,
>> 1) Both Whitney and MacDonell and Coulson's sandhi chart say that word
>> final "n" remains unchanged before "s".
>>
>> But checking three different printed editions of the Daksinamurtistotram,
>> they all have:
>> अमुष्मिं स्तवे
>>
>> What do the grammarians say about word final "n" before "s"? Is it
>> optional to change a word final "n" to anusvara before "s" or Is the
>> anusvara in this case merely a typographical convenience?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harry Spier
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>> committee)
>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
>> unsubscribe)
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20180815/c431452d/attachment.htm>
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list