[INDOLOGY] a question regarding the usage of -gotra versus -sagotra

Krishnaprasad G krishnaprasadah.g at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 19:48:20 UTC 2017

all gotras should be added sa
bhaardhvaaj sagotra etc.
 Charudeva Shastry uses it every where. This rule is said in Grhya sutra
etc, I don't remember right now. I will send reference later. But every
gotra is added sa and not only few.

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Madhav Deshpande <mmdesh at umich.edu> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>      I am forwarding a question from a friend of mine, for which I do not
> have a clear answer:
> Quote:
> Dear Madhav,
> I thought you might have a quick answer to this question. When mentioning
> gotras, one sees "Visvāmitra gotra", but also "Ātreyasa gotra", and
> "Kāsyapasa gotra".
> Since the ṛṣis in the two latter cases are Atri and Kasyapa, it would
> appear that the corresponding gotras should be "Ātreya" and "Kāsyapa",
> without the "sa" suffix. (Indeed, one also sees "Ātreya gotra", and
> "Kāsyapa gotra".)
> Is it the case that the correct terms are "Ātreya sagotra", and "Kāsyapa
> sagotra", and the conventional usage is simply an incorrect parsing?
> However, this would require "Visvāmitra sagotra", which one does not see.
> Or is there something more to it than that?
> Unquote
> Why would someone be referred to as Viśvāmitra-gotra, but others as
> Ātreya-sagotra or Kāśyapa-sagotra?  I will appreciate a clarification.
> Madhav Deshpande
> Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20170103/17b1edf4/attachment.htm>

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list