[INDOLOGY] warriors v soldiers
Paolo Eugenio Rosati
paoloe.rosati at gmail.com
Sat Oct 15 09:02:53 UTC 2016
Dear prof./dear all,
Just before that thousands people sand me protests against the use of
from the Oxford dictionary (on-line): Tribe = A social division in a
traditional society consisting of families or communities linked by social,
economic, religious, or blood ties, with a common culture and dialect,
typically having a recognized leader.
I do not find nothing negative in the noun "tribe" neither in the adj
"Tribal" that I'm used to write with capital letter as Hindu.
I find more appropriate to speak of Tribal than to use the generic
"local/atochthonous"---that do not imply any cultural or religios
tradition---or the negative NON-describers as
Tribal groups ARE, and in my opinion is more denigratory describe their
culture as non-SOMETHING. I prefer to be a Tribal than a non-Aryan, I
prefer to have an oral tradition than to have a non-written tradition, and
so on. They are, their culture existed and still exists; and they
influenced so deeply the mainstream Hinduism (and not only the Tantric
phnemoena) that I'm wondering how it is possible to associate the word
"Tribal" with negative connotations.
Going back to the problem.
J.C. Harle [(1963) "Durga Goddess of Victory" *Artibus Asiae 26* (3/4):
*On the worshipping figures in the DurgA images, those at Pullamangai are
carved in the greates detail, and a good deal can be discerned of their
physiognomies and costume (fig. 4). Each has a curious mask-like face in
which the eyes appear as narrow slits, and wears his hair in a kind of
top-knot; the figure on the right has, in addition, a mustache and a
close-cropped beard. Both wear scabbards hanging from the waist on the
right side, and a garment which (where it can be seen) comes to a point in
front between the legs. They are both naked above the waists and wear*
suvarna vaikakshakas *(or *channa viras*),* *not sacred cords. It is worth
nothing that in the* ShilapaddikAram *the Marvar*, *or at least the elders,
are said to wear moustaches while in another work a beared "Marravan"
leader is mentioned. Wheater or not, however, the beared man in the
Pullamangai image may represent forest or desert people like Maravar, or
else a member of some particular caste or comunity, too little is known
about costume and physical types in Pallava and Cola times to be able to
say.* (pp. 245-6)
Thus even if it is uncertain the identification with Tribals, in my opinion
(and I would like to have the right to guess, as most will guess that the
two worshippers are not-Tribals) they are Tribals.
Furthermore, M. Tartakov and V. Dehejia (1984) "Sharing, Intrusion, and
Influences: The Mahishasuramardini Imagery of the Calukyas and the
Pallavas" *Artibus Asiae 45* (4) 287-345, particularly see pp.329-30 and
They seems to share the original idea of Harle that the devotees were not
Hindus (and I'm not speaking of Indo-Aryan or Aryan).
I wish I clarify my position on the use of "Tribal" and explained better
what I means when I used "somatic traits".
On 15 October 2016 at 05:13, Sudalaimuthu Palaniappan <Palaniappa at aol.com>
> Dear Dr. Rosati,
> Can you elaborate as to what the somatic traits of Tribals are?
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Paolo Eugenio Rosati <paoloe.rosati at gmail.com>
> Patrick, I can say that Pallava and Cola rulers probably used Tribal
> people as soldiers as testified by some sculptural reliefs of "victorious
> Durga", where two worshippers at her sides are represented with somatic
> traits of Tribals---and self-cutting their heads or flesh from their thigh.
> I think your question is interesting.
> Paolo E. Rosati
> Oriental Archaeologist
> PhD candidate in Civilisations of Asia & Africa
> Section: South Asia
> Dep. Italian Institute of Oriental Studies (ISO)
> 'Sapienza' University of Rome
> paoloe.rosati at uniroma1.it
> paoloe.rosati at gmail.com
> Mobile: (+39) 3387383472
> Skype: paoloe.rosati
> Da: patrick mccartney <psdmccartney at gmail.com>
> Inviato: 14/10/2016 03:30
> A: Indology List <indology at list.indology.info>
> Oggetto: [INDOLOGY] warriors v soldiers
> Dear Friends,
> Please forgive the possibly naive nature of this question, but was it the
> case that all warriors were considered to be of the same kṣatriya class?
> Or, was it possible that the 'officers' were kṣatriyas and the 'foot
> soldiers' were perhaps of a different caste, i.e. enslaved śudras forced to
> fight? Is there any discussion of the militiary organisation according to
> ranks, size and hierarchy similar to the table below?
> Thanks in advance.
> All the best,
> Patrick McCartney, PhD
> School of Culture, History & Language
> College of the Asia-Pacific
> The Australian National University
> Canberra, Australia, 0200
> Skype - psdmccartney
> Phone + Whatsapp: +61 414 954 748
> Twitter - @psdmccartney
> academia <https://anu-au.academia.edu/patrickmccartney>
> Edanz <https://www.edanzediting.com/expert/anthropology/patrick-mccartney>
> #yogabodyANU2016 symposium <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X80KxW2bb0w>
> Ep1 - Imagining Sanskrit Land <https://youtu.be/jMi7tkPBbJ4>
> Ep 2 - Total-am <https://youtu.be/7tAp8m9RHPU>
> Ep 3 - Jalam ≠ Chillum <https://youtu.be/cLZeuCT_mwQ>
> Ep 4 - It's Time to get Married
> A Day in our Ashram
> Stop animation short film of Shakuntala
> Forced to Clean Human Waste <http://youtu.be/y3XfjbwqC_g>
> One of my favourite song
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
Paolo E. Rosati
PhD candidate in "Civilizations of Asia and Africa"
South Asia Section
Dep. Italian Institute of Oriental Studies/ISO
'Sapienza' University of Rome
paoloe.rosati at uniroma1.it
paoloe.rosati at gmail.com
Mobile: (+39) 338 73 83 472
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the INDOLOGY