[INDOLOGY] by chance, accidentally
hr at ivs.edu
Mon May 16 23:02:47 UTC 2016
Interesting question. In the Maha-bharata, for example, human effort — purusha-kAra — is contrasted with daiva — providence/divine intervention or will. In Bhagavad-gita 9.10, we find the statement that “Prakrti begets…by my supervision/oversight (adhy-aksha)." In the Gita 13.21, and elsewhere, we find a two part concept of causality that matches the twin ontology of body and soul. Not to speak of the philosophical implications of karma.
These are well known approaches to causality.
I am also curious to know to what extent Indian tradition has considered pure chance, sometimes called yadRcchA, or adverbially akasmAt, to be a legitimate cause of events or conditions in this world.
> On May 16, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Artur Karp <karp at uw.edu.pl> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues.
> one more question.
> Do you know of something, some event, that happened accidentally, by pure chance - but, finally, had the power to influence the development of the Indian Civilization (in the spheres of thought, religion, social relations, etc.)?
> Status of "(pure, sheer) chance" in Indian thought?
> Artur Karp
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the INDOLOGY