[INDOLOGY] Authenticity of the Vastusutra Upanishad

Dipak Bhattacharya dipak.d2004 at gmail.com
Sat May 14 07:04:05 UTC 2016

Arlo Griffiths *The Atharvaveda and its Paippalādaśākhā* Aachen 2007 p.145
states against my adverse remarks on the commentary and of M. Asher (JAOS
104 [1984], 599f.,) on the ‘entire text’ as mentioned by Griffiths (*loc
cit*), that his sources confirm that ‘at least a text of this name has been
in circulation’



On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Fabrice Duvinage <
fabrice.duvinage at gmail.com> wrote:

> As a student, I had the opportunity to write a book about Indian bronzes.
> So I tried not to rely only on secondary sources and get deeper in primary
> sources, but it was a bit frustrating, the contents were kind of
> unexpected, not exactly what I would have hope to find. On the contrary,
> the Vastusutra Upanishad suited so well to my European mind that I doubted
> about its authenticity. I was a beginner and still feel like that after 30
> years of research, but now I’ve heard and read that some people actually
> think that it might be not authentic. Does anybody knows about articles or
> serious research about it?
> Sincerely yours,
> Fabrice Duvinage
> 10, rue Alfred Mézières
> 54000 Nancy
> 0652825128
> http://fabriceduvinage.de/
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20160514/11a91a6b/attachment.htm>

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list