[INDOLOGY] Article about the politics surrounding indology at the IHRC

[Jesse Knutson]

I think Dilip Chakrabarty is actually thinking about racism from a totally
different angle. What is racist is the notion that 'aryans'--the speakers
of Old Indo-Aryan, or what have you--originated within the subcontinent,
and that they predate and include the Indus Valley Civilization. Bharadvaj
clearly wants to demonstrate that the composers of the Vedas were
indigenous, and of an antiquity greater than the Indus Valley Civilization.
This is racist on many levels. 1. There is a cultural chauvinism that
anything good must originate in the womb of Bharata Mātā 2. Bharadvaj wants
to say that the Indus Valley Civilization emerged from the Vedic culture,
when in fact the IVC was a highly developed civilization, of greater
antiquity than the Veda, which did not speak an Indo-Aryan or Indo-European
language. To attribute the IVC cultural achievements to the speakers of
Vedic is extremely racist and chauvinistic.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Simon Brodbeck <BrodbeckSP at cardiff.ac.uk>
wrote:

>  Dear Howard,
>
>
>
> I think that regardless of any etymological link, we need to apply a
> semantic distinction between the Sanskrit word arya and the English word
> Aryan. When the former is translated, it tends to come out as “noble” or
> something like that (e.g. in truths 1 to 4 of that ilk), rather than as
> “Aryan”. Under the latter, the OED reads as follows (“arya” has no entry):
>
>
>
> *A.* adj.
>
>  *1.*
>
> a.       Applied by some to the great division or family of languages,
> which includes Sanskrit, Zend, Persian, Greek, Latin, Celtic, Teutonic, and
> Slavonic, with their modern representatives; also called *Indo-European*,
> *Indo-Germanic*, and sometimes *Japhetic*; by others restricted to the
> Asiatic portion of these. *absol.*, the original Aryan or Arian language.
>
> b.      *spec.* Of or pertaining to the ancient Aryan people.
>
> *2.* Under the Nazi régime (1933–45) applied to the inhabitants of
> Germany of non-Jewish extraction.
>
>
>
> *B.* n.
>
> 1. A member of the Aryan family; one belonging to, or descended from, the
> ancient people who spoke the parent Aryan language.
>
> *2.* *spec.* under the Nazi régime (cf. sense A. 2
> <http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/11296?redirectedFrom=aryan#eid38293561>).
>
>
>
> I think Chakrabarti is probably thinking in terms of meanings A1b and B1.
> But I can’t speak for him.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Simon Brodbeck
>
> Cardiff University
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* INDOLOGY [mailto:indology-bounces at list.indology.info] *On Behalf
> Of *Howard Resnick
> *Sent:* 08 June 2015 15:10
> *To:* Geoffrey Samuel
> *Cc:* Dominik Wujastyk; Indology List
> *Subject:* Re: [INDOLOGY] Article about the politics surrounding indology
> at the IHRC
>
>
>
> As we know, Arya is a Vedic term. In the Telegraph article, Bharadwaj
> states that he wants to research the notion of Aryan migration. Bharadwaj
> does not state that he takes ‘Aryan’ as a racial, rather than a cultural,
> term. So please help me here. Where is the racism?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Howard
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:04 PM, Geoffrey Samuel <SamuelG at cardiff.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> If you read Dilip Chakrabarti's comment as quoted in the Telegraph
> article, what he was actually saying was that the concept of Aryans was
> 'racist and historically puerile' and that research on it was therefore a
> waste of resources in comparison with other possible uses - he specifically
> referred to training more palaeographers and epigraphists, 'who will soon
> be an extinct class of scholars in the country'.
>
>
>
> That seems a reasonable and defensible position.
>
>
>
> Geoffrey
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* INDOLOGY <indology-bounces at list.indology.info> on behalf of
> Howard Resnick <hr at ivs.edu>
> *Sent:* 08 June 2015 09:12
> *To:* Dominik Wujastyk
> *Cc:* Indology List
> *Subject:* Re: [INDOLOGY] Article about the politics surrounding indology
> at the IHRC
>
>
>
> "Dilip K. Chakrabarti, emeritus professor of South Asian archaeology with
> Cambridge University and a member of the council and its research project
> committee, said the proposal was "racist and historically puerile”.
>
>
>
> How racist?
>
>
>
> h.r.
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150606/jsp/nation/story_24264.jsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>



-- 
Jesse Ross Knutson PhD
Assistant Professor of Sanskrit and Bengali, Department of Indo-Pacific
Languages and Literatures
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
452A Spalding


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20150608/ade2cf23/attachment.htm>