[INDOLOGY] Sahyādrikhaṇḍa

Sat Aug 9 20:49:27 UTC 2014

Dear Dr. Rupali and Prof. Madhav,

The Sahyādrikhaṇḍa (Cunha's edition in 1877) can be downloaded free from archive.org. I will send you the Gaytonde edition if I ever locate a PDF of it.

https://archive.org/details/Sahyadri-Khanda

Best Wishes,
Rohana
------------------------------------------------
Rohana Seneviratne
DPhil Student in Sanskrit
The Oriental Institute
Faculty of Oriental Studies
University of Oxford
Pusey Lane, Oxford
OX1 2LE
United Kingdom

Email: rohana.seneviratne at orinst.ox.ac.uk
Web: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~pemb3753/
________________________________
From: INDOLOGY [indology-bounces at list.indology.info] on behalf of Madhav Deshpande [mmdesh at umich.edu]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 7:04 PM
To: Dr. Rupali Mokashi; indology at list.indology.info
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] INDOLOGY Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9

Dear Dr. Mokashi,
I have the pdf of the Kunha edition of Sahyādrikhaṇḍa at home.  Currently I am away from home till August 25.  If you cannot find any edition by then, you can contact me again.  At the same time, if you receive a pdf of the Gaytonde edition from someone, please forward that pdf to me.  Thanks.

Madhav Deshpande

On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Dr. Rupali Mokashi <dr.rupalimokashi at gmail.com<mailto:dr.rupalimokashi at gmail.com>> wrote:

Where can I find Sayadri Khandha)" -Ed. Dr. Jarson D. Kunha, Marathi version Ed. By Gajanan Shastri Gaytonde. Published by Shree Katyani Publication, Mumbai
Rupali Mokashi

On 09-Aug-2014 9:32 pm, <indology-request at list.indology.info<mailto:indology-request at list.indology.info>> wrote:
Send INDOLOGY mailing list submissions to
        indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology_list.indology.info

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        indology-request at list.indology.info<mailto:indology-request at list.indology.info>

You can reach the person managing the list at
        indology-owner at list.indology.info<mailto:indology-owner at list.indology.info>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of INDOLOGY digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Pali question (Gleb Sharygin)
   2. Puloman (Howard Resnick)
   3. Re: Pali question (Chris Clark)
   4. Calukya/Caulukya, etc. (Martin Gansten)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 00:42:16 +0400
From: Gleb Sharygin <gleb.sharygin at gmail.com<mailto:gleb.sharygin at gmail.com>>
To: indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Pali question
Message-ID:
        <CALPiqitPSNyt=DJG=-c_wVqZrvr1r2q14fErvKNJxhYSL0KOiw at mail.gmail.com<mailto:c_wVqZrvr1r2q14fErvKNJxhYSL0KOiw at mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Dear Dr. Walser,

"-tv?" is perfectly grammatical and standard, while "-tva" isn't (must be a
typo. Most PTS editions were made on a basis of only a few MSS.) See
Geiger's "A P?li grammar", ?? 209-210.

With best regards,
Gleb Sharygin

> I was using the CSCD Pali canon and noticed that in the Sutta Nipata, the
> > fourth verse of the Upasivamanavapuccha has the line: ?ki?ca??a? nissito
> > hitv? ma??a?. The PTS has, ?ki?ca??a? nissito hitva ma??a?;
> >
> > Is  hitv? (long a) a legitimate variant that appears in the Burmese
> > version or the Thai version, or is it a typo?
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -j
> >
> > Joseph Walser
> > Associate Professor
> > Department of Religion
> > Tufts University
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
> http://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology_list.indology.info
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology_list.indology.info/attachments/20140809/85fef018/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 19:17:00 -0400
From: Howard Resnick <hr at ivs.edu<mailto:hr at ivs.edu>>
To: Indology List <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Puloman
Message-ID: <4272141E-4C0C-4850-9702-3C5D22903EBA at ivs.edu<mailto:4272141E-4C0C-4850-9702-3C5D22903EBA at ivs.edu>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

It is said that Indra killed his father-in-law Puloman. Could anyone kindly explain the circumstances of that slaying? Thanks!

Howard

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 15:56:04 -0800
From: Chris Clark <chris.clark at inbox.com<mailto:chris.clark at inbox.com>>
To: indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Pali question
Message-ID: <13864889B60.00000D50chris.clark at inbox.com<mailto:13864889B60.00000D50chris.clark at inbox.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Dear Gleb,

While hitv? is standard P?li, in this verse hitva is m.c. for hitv?, as pointed out by Norman (2006: 391) in his translation and study of Sn (?The Group of Discourses?). Based on the critical apparatus of the PTS edition, it appears that hitva was the reading found in the editors' Sinhala script manuscript witnesses, while hitv? was the reading found in their Burmese script manuscript witnesses. Neither reading is erroneous.

Regards,
Chris Clark
PhD candidate
University of Sydney

---

Dear Dr. Walser,

"-tv?" is perfectly grammatical and standard, while "-tva" isn't (must be a typo. Most PTS editions were made on a basis of only a few MSS.) See Geiger's "A P?li grammar", ?? 209-210.

With best regards,
Gleb Sharygin

> I was using the CSCD Pali canon and noticed that in the Sutta Nipata, the
> fourth verse of the Upasivamanavapuccha has the line: ?ki?ca??a? nissito
> hitv? ma??a?. The PTS has, ?ki?ca??a? nissito hitva ma??a?;
>
> Is ?hitv? (long a) a legitimate variant that appears in the Burmese
> version or the Thai version, or is it a typo?
> Thanks!
>
> -j
>
> Joseph Walser
> Associate Professor
> Department of Religion
> Tufts University

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 15:22:16 +0200
From: Martin Gansten <martin.gansten at pbhome.se<mailto:martin.gansten at pbhome.se>>
To: Indology <indology at list.indology.info<mailto:indology at list.indology.info>>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Calukya/Caulukya, etc.
Message-ID: <53E62088.7030404 at pbhome.se<mailto:53E62088.7030404 at pbhome.se>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

I?d be grateful for some elucidation on the following from list members
knowledgeable about royal dynasties in medieval India, particularly the
northwest:

In his Daivaj??la?k?ti (1336 CE), the author Teja?si?ha, apparently of
Gujarat and belonging to a family of (former?) royal ministers
(mantrin), extols the Pr?gv??a dynasty (va??a) in general and speaks
particularly of a certain Vikrama, apparently standing in some sort of
feudatory relationship to ?the glorious King ??ra?gadeva, whose fame had
become the head-ornament of the kings born in the illustrious C?lukya
dynasty? (sph?rjac-c?lukya-va??odbhava-n?pati-?irobh??a??-bh?ta-k?rte?
?r?mac-ch?ra?gadev?hvaya-puru?apate??). My questions are:

1. I had understood the C?lukyas and Caulukyas to be two different
dynasties, the C?lukyas being earlier and primarily ruling in the South,
whereas the Caulukyas ruled in the northwest. Is there any way that
?C?lukya? could be anything other than a scribal error here? (I have
access only to a single MS of the text, but Pingree?s CESS [A3 89],
based on a different MS, gives the same reading, without comment.)

2. Teja?si?ha doesn?t quite call ??ra?gadeva a C?lukya/Caulukya, but
almost. I?m assuming that this is the Vaghela king ??ra?gadeva, which
would fit the time frame. Are the Vaghelas typically (or at least
sometimes) considered C?lukyas/Caulukyas?

3. Is the Vikrama associated with ??ra?gadeva known from any other sources?

As always, many thanks in advance for any help!

Martin Gansten

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
http://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology_list.indology.info

------------------------------

End of INDOLOGY Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9
***************************************

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info<mailto:INDOLOGY at list.indology.info>
http://listinfo.indology.info

--
Madhav M. Deshpande
Professor of Sanskrit and Linguistics
Department of Asian Languages and Cultures
202 South Thayer Street, Suite 6111
The University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1608, USA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20140809/d8499fbe/attachment.htm>