Joint Letters

[Dipak Bhattacharya]

INDOLOGY at liverpool.ac.uk
<INDOLOGY at liverpool.ac.uk>;
5mr12
The
query has some assumptions that do not hold for Sanskrit. The Sanskrit grammars
deal with phonemes but not with written letters. Joint phonemes will be the
correct phrase. There is nothing on ligatures in Sanskrit grammar that
necessarily belong to scripts. The concept of ligature grew in the first
millennium. 
saṃyogais the accepted term for
consonantal conjunct. If we go by the akṣara concept every akṣara is a
combination of consonant/s and a vowel, hence joint too. 
Sanskrit
orthography goes by its own law of akṣara.
This has been touched in some of the nineteenth century grammars of Sanskrit. In
writing, the final a is understood but not the other vowels. Hence
kapāla = कपाल. There is
one ligature here but it is not recognized in Sanskrit grammar as saṃyoga. In
the क्ताof vaktā one
gets a more complex ligature.  The –kt-
is a saṃyoga.
I hope the position is clear.
Best
DB


________________________________
 From: Harsha Dehejia <harshadehejia at HOTMAIL.COM>
To: INDOLOGY at liverpool.ac.uk 
Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2012 6:31 PM
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Joint Letters
 

 
Friends~
 
I am researching the tradition of joining two letters.
 
1. In the bhashas it is calledjodakshara. What is the Sanskrit word for this?
2. Is this in any way related to joining two images as in Ardhanari or Harihara?
3. What is the semantic impact of joining two letters or images?
 
Kind regards.
 
Harsha
Prof. Harsha V. Dehejia
Ottawa, ON., Canada.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20120306/0da75571/attachment.htm>