Fw: Re: [INDOLOGY] Fwd: [INDOLOGY] taxonomy question

[Dipak Bhattacharya]

--- On Sun, 21/8/11, Dipak Bhattacharya <dbhattacharya200498 at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Dipak Bhattacharya <dbhattacharya200498 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Fwd: [INDOLOGY] taxonomy question
To: "Artur Karp" <karp at uw.edu.pl>
Date: Sunday, 21 August, 2011, 10:45 AM

Intensive study of the inscriptions is the main instrument. That can be misused: V.Smith, for example, saw nothing beyond feeling of unity with animals, a view indirectly reiterated by Keith,  as if Asoka did not feel for man. D. D. Kosambi (junior) will help those who want to find the 'break'. The abolition of apavaahana is something mentioned by the emperor himself that was bound to result in loss of revenue and the enterpreneurship of the state. I need not state them here. After Kosambi and Romila Thapar it is not necessary to speculate on the break, nor difficult to do away with the previous garbage.
The present correspondent's study is in Bengali , hence will not help
Best
DB
--- On Sun, 21/8/11, Artur Karp <karp at uw.edu.pl> wrote:

From: Artur Karp <karp at uw.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Fwd: [INDOLOGY] taxonomy question
To: "Dipak Bhattacharya" <dbhattacharya200498 at yahoo.com>
Cc: INDOLOGY at liverpool.ac.uk
Date: Sunday, 21 August, 2011, 7:36 AM



2011/8/21 Dipak Bhattacharya <dbhattacharya200498 at yahoo.com>

Asoka was a reformer breaking with the past.
As a reformer AND a politician - how far would Aśoka go with his project of  breaking with the past?

To even try to answer this we would first need to know what was his idea about what constituted the past. 
Artur K. 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20110821/e7892a91/attachment.htm>