A note on Poets in the Akananuru
George Hart
glhart at BERKELEY.EDU
Fri Apr 16 21:41:36 UTC 2010
I meant to send this to the Tamil list -- still, authorship of Indic
texts is an interesting subject. There are a lot of lists! Sorry.
George Hart
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:09 PM, George Hart <glhart at BERKELEY.EDU> wrote:
> I am working through the Akananuru now, constantly struck by the
> ingenuity of the poets. The words of Māgha certainly fit:
>
> kṣaṇe kṣaṇe yan navatām upaiti tad eva rūpam ramaṇīyatāy
> āḥ
>
> That which becomes new every moment is the very form of beauty.
>
> The poems rehearse the same situations and often the same imagery
> over and over, yet each one seems to have something new and
> extraordinary that makes it different from the others. In any
> event, I remember speaking with Rajam once about the Akananuru and
> she remarked how different the poems of Paraṇar and Kapilar are. Af
> ter working through many poems, I am struck by how unerring her insi
> ght is (and I am indebted to her for pointing this out). We constan
> tly wonder about the authorship of these poems -- are the attributio
> ns simply made up, or are they real? In some poems, it is clear tha
> t the anthologist has taken liberties -- I doubt that anyone really
> believes the poems attributed to Pāri Makaḷir are by Pāri's
> daughters. But, after seeing how the techniques of Pāri and Kapilar
> are so different and how the poems of each have similar styles, I a
> m beginning to wonder whether in fact the attributed authorship of t
> he Sangam poems is not in fact accurate. Is there any evidence, for
> example, that Kapilar did NOT write the century of poems in the Ain
> kurunuru attributed to him (Martha Selby has said she believes the A
> inkurunuru to be late)? Or that the Sangam poets who are supposed t
> o have written the Pattuppāṭṭu may not have been the same as in
> "earlier" works. Note that in Tamil love poetry and Poetics, Takaha
> shi believes that some of the anthologies are late and thus that the
> authorial attributions are incorrect. I'd be interested in what pe
> ople think about this. George
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list