Use of Devanagari for Sanskrit
Benjamin Fleming
fleming_b4 at HOTMAIL.COM
Tue Sep 4 21:08:13 UTC 2007
Dear George Heart
I cannot speak broadly to the phenomenon, but I can note the patterns that
we find in MSS of the Shiva Purana in particular. The older MSS I examined
at the University of Madras were all Sanskrit-Telugu (ca. 17-19th c.),
whereas the Devanagari MSS at the Adyar library were typically much newer.
Hope that helps,
Best Wishes,
Benjamin Fleming
On 9/4/07 3:40 PM, "George Hart" <glhart at BERKELEY.EDU> wrote:
> In a draft about unicode Eric Muller has written "By the eleventh
> century, the modern script known as Devanagari was in ascendancy in
> India proper as the major script of Sanskrit literature." This seems
> wrong to me -- certainly, in South India grantha, Telugu, Malayalam
> and Kannada scripts continued to be used for Sanskrit into the 20th
> century and, to some extent, are still used (e.g. by priests in the
> Murugan temple in Concord, CA). I would be interested in getting
> some feedback on this matter -- when and where did Devanagari become
> standard for Sanskrit? I would guess that it begins fairly early in
> the North and only reaches South India in the 20th century. Many
> years ago, I purchased 2 large collections of Sri Vaisnava books from
> the estates of two devotees who had passed away (their children had
> no use for them, sadly). The books, all of which were published in
> the first half of the 20th century, include perhaps 1/3 Sanskrit
> texts. Of these about 1/10 are in devanagari, 75% are in Telugu
> script and 15% are in grantha. The collections also include a large
> number (30%) of Tamil books printed in Telugu script -- which enables
> one to write Sanskrit phonemes which are not represented in the Tamil
> script. The rest are Tamil books in Tamil script, with Sanskrit
> (quoted and used liberally by commentators) generally in grantha. It
> is worth remembering that after 1100 or so, the majority of Sanskrit
> writers have been South Indians -- at least that is what I have
> read. George Hart
>
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list