converb (gerund) in Vedic texts
Asko Parpola
asko.parpola at HELSINKI.FI
Tue Jul 3 17:07:52 UTC 2007
For the converb in the earliest Vedic texts, see:
Tikkanen, Bertil, 1987. The Sanskrit gerund: A synchronic, diachronic and
typological analysis. (Studia Orientalia 62.) Helsinki. 378 pp.
Reviewed: Gillian R. Hart, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1988
(2): 439-440; Alain Christol, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de
Paris 83, 1988: 137-139; Stephanie W. Jamison, Journal of the American
Oriental Society 109 (3) 1989: 459-461; Hans Henrich Hock, Kratylos 37,
1992: 62-68; Annemarie Etter, Indogermanische Forschungen 95, 1990: 262-265;
Jared S. Klein, Language 66 (1), 1990: 210-211.
Tikkanen, Bertil, 1991. On the syntax of Sanskrit gerund constructions: A
functional approach. In: Hans Henrich Hock (ed.), Studies in Sanskrit
syntax: A volume in honor of the centennial of Speijer's Sanskrit syntax
(1886-1986): 197-207. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
There is also an edited volume on converbs in general, where Bertil Tikkanen
has written a paper on the Burushaski converbs:
Tikkanen, Bertil, 1995. Burushaski converbs in their South and Central Asian
areal context. Pp. 487-528 in: Haspelmath, Martin, and Ekkehard Konig, 1995.
(Ed.) Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and meaning of
adverbial verb* forms -- adverbial participles, gerunds. (Empirical
approaches to language typology, 13.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de
Gruyter.
He has a general paper on converbs as well:
Tikkanen, Bertil, 2001. Converbs. Pp. 1112-1123 in: Haspelmath, Martin,
Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible, 2001. (Ed.) Language
typology and language universals: An international handbook, volume 2.
Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Best regards, Asko Parpola
Quoting Gregory Bailey <Greg.Bailey at LATROBE.EDU.AU>:
> Dear list,
>
> A colleague has made the following request. Any replies would be
> helpful.
>
> Cheers
> Greg Bailey
>
> I'm looking for evidence of linguistic convergence with respect to
> clause chaining via converbs (=conjunctive participles) in South Asia. It
> would be useful to establish if this was a feature of the earliest Vedic
> texts. If it wasn't, then this suggests that clause chaining may have
> developed through contact with unrelated languages of the subcontinent,
> and especially if it is attested in later Sanskrit texts. My suspicion
> that this may be the case is raised by the fact that extensive clause
> chaining via converbs is not a feature of IE languages of Europe, but
> seems to be extremely common in the modern IA languages. Do you know
> where I can find some interlinearised and glossed Vedic texts to prove or
> dispel my suspicions?
>
>
> ---
> Alec Coupe, PhD
> ARC Postdoctoral Fellow
> Linguistics Program
> La Trobe University
> Victoria 3086
> Australia
> Tel +61 3 9479-3297
> Fax +61 3 9479-1520
> web page: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/linguistics/staff/Coupe.html
>
>
Asko Parpola
Institute for Asian and African Studies
POB 59 (Unioninkatu 38 B)
FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list