Axel Michaels edited book "The Pandit"
hans henrich hock
hhhock at UX1.CSO.UIUC.EDU
Mon Oct 29 16:56:44 UTC 2001
George Hart is making a good point. Too often we (and that includes
me) tend to forget the role of non-Brahmins in the Indian
tradition--in spite of the fact that we all know better (or should).
Hans Henrich Hock
>Might I humbly suggest that when Mr. Michaels entitles the book he
>edits "Traditional Scholarship in India," he perpetuates an extremely
>wrong and unfortunate stereotype: that in traditional India, only the
>Brahmins were learned. The fact is, most of Tamil literature is by
>non-Brahmins, and it is quite as extensive as Sanskrit. And, in
>Sanskrit and the Prakrits, an enormous amount of literature was
>produced by various non-Brahmins (e.g. Jains and Buddhists) who were
>not Brahmins and Pundits (which, incidentally, is a Dravidian word).
>Even low castes have their own literary traditions in South India --
>are we to suppose they are somehow inferior as human beings and their
>rich traditions are not worthy to be placed beside that of people who
>happen to be Brahmins? WE MUST GET BEYOND RACIAL AND CASTE
>STEREOTYPING WHEN WE DESCRIBE PREMODERN INDIA. With respect and
>hope, George Hart, Prof. of Tamil, Berkeley.
More information about the INDOLOGY