Uninformed discussion on the Gita
Richard B Mahoney
rbm49 at STUDENT.CANTERBURY.AC.NZ
Mon Mar 26 00:14:15 UTC 2001
Dear Dominik,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 11:34:59PM +0100, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
> The discussion of the Gita this month has generated 50 messages
> to date, yet not one citation of Jean Przyluski's famous and
> fundamental study of the work. How is this possible?
It may be that most posters have taken de Jong's criticism of
Przyluski's later work to heart.[1] Apparently ...
In later publications Przyluski succumbed to a mania of
comparatism which led him to discover everywhere non-Indian
influences.
This sounds like a disturbing condition. One really wouldn't want
to spend much time with someone who had developed it. 8-)
[1] p. 46 in de Jong, J.W. `A Brief History of Buddhist Studies
in Europe and America' (Delhi: Sri Satguru, 1987)
--
------------------------ Richard Mahoney -------------------------
78 Jeffreys Rd +64-3-351-5831
Christchurch New Zealand
--------------- mailto:rbm49 at csc.canterbury.ac.nz ----------------
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list