Evidence for the Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir (fwd)

[Prof. D N Jha]

Every time I tried to access the website, I got the message "Debug" It seems
the documents there are full of communal viruses.
DNJ
----- Original Message -----
From: Dominik Wujastyk <ucgadkw at UCL.AC.UK>
To: <INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:36 PM
Subject: Evidence for the Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir (fwd)


> I have been asked to forward this information, and I do for general
> information, but without subscribing to the opinions it promotes.
>
> The home page of this organization contains such resonant metaphors as
>
>  "Today, our dear Mother, Maa Bharat, is fighting for survival. Countless
>  separatist strikes from all sides threaten to tear Her apart limb from
>  limb. The vile, insidious disease of corruption, spread by self-serving
>  politicians is spreading its venomous juices slowly through Her body."
>
> which may serve to give an sense of the orientation of this material.
>
> --
> Dominik Wujastyk
> Founder, INDOLOGY list
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 07:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: The Nation of Hindutva <hindu-rashtra at yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: hindu-rashtra at geocities.com
> To: Dominic Wujastyk <ucgadkw at ucl.ac.uk>
> Subject: Evidence for the Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir
>
> Dear sir,
>
> Please forward the following message to your List.
>
> The archaeological, historical and legal evidence presented by Vishva
> Hindu Parishad (VHP) to the Government of India (on December 23, 1990)
> in support of their claim that the Babri Masjid was constructed after
> demolishing a Hindu temple at that site has been reproduced in toto at
> the following website.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/hindu-rashtra/ramjanmabhoomi
>
> The website also contains the entire text of the VHP's rejoinder
> (submitted to the Government of India on January 6, 1991) to the
> documents provided by the All India Babri Masjid Action Committee
> (AIBMAC).
>
> The website will eventually also contain the following:
>
> 1. Evidence offered by AIBMAC in support of their position.
> 2. Rejoinder of "eminent" historians to the VHP documents.
> 3. Details of the 200 artifacts of the ancient temple unearthed below
> the structure of the demolished mosque on December 6, 1992.
> 4. Legal opinions on the matter.
> 5. Additional historical material of relevance like the Kapad Dwar map
> collection of the Maharaja of Jaipur.
> 6. Opinions of renowned archaeologists and historians (like B B Lal,
> Iravatham Mahadevan etc.)
> 7. A detailed bibliography.
>
> Please stay tuned. Any suggestions and corrections are most welcome.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> The 'Nation of Hindutva' Project
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>