Rajaram's bogus "horse seal"

[Subrahmanya S.]

>
>nanda chandran wrote :
>
>Also if you notice in the photo supplied by M Witzel the belly stretches
>out
>straight without curving into the genital area.
>But in Mackay's photo the belly of the animal has already curved -
>seemingly
>towards the frontal part of the body. And it would
>be difficult to place the genitals in a spot after the belly
>curve - atleast I've seen no bull or cow with such a genital
>positioning. So I doubt if both the pictures are of the same animal. The
>inscriptions alone cannot testify to this equation.
>
>And your ability to use photoshop to the advantage of the
>horse theory only seems to strengthen the Rajaram's and
>Jha's case!
>

Exactly - I suggest that list members should take a second look
at the difference between #453 and #772-A

Farmer & Witzel have infact strengthened Rajaram/Jha's case
with their Photoshop abilities :))

Regards,
Subrahmanya

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com