no

DAVID GRAY dbgray62 at HOME.COM
Wed Jul 19 02:18:19 UTC 2000


Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
>
> A member has made the following suggestion that all INDOLOGY messages
> should have "[INDOLOGY]" prefixed to the subject line.
>
> Personally, I have a mail filter set up that automatically sends incoming
> indology messages to a separate folder, based on the string "indology" in
> the "to: " field.  So I have no need for such a prefix.  In fact I would
> prefer not to have it, since it "steals" ten characters from the length of
> the subject line.
>
> Let's vote on this issue.
>
> If you want a prefix, send a message to INDOLOGY with the subject line
> "prefix - yes".
>
> If you don't want a prefix, send a message to INDOLOGY with the subject
> line "prefix - no".
>
> --
> Dominik Wujastyk
> Founder, INDOLOGY list
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 23:01:57 +0200
> From: Thomas Anzenhofer <thomas.anzenhofer at uni-koeln.de>
> To: D.Wujastyk at ucl.ac.uk
> Subject: Subject-prefix for INDOLOGY
>
> Dear Mr. Wujastyk,
>
> Being a subscriber to INDOLOGY, I would like to make a suggestion:
>
> Couldn't it be possible to generate a subject prefix for all the messages
> that are distributed via INDOLOGY? I'm managing three mailing lists myself,
> and Majordomo (which we use in Cologne) allows to insert a string at the
> beginning of the subject header of each message. Our list "Indologie" has
> f. e. "[Indologie] ":
>
> (Original message:)
>
> Subject: Internet-Radioprogramme in indischen Sprachen
>
> (Message received from "Indologie":)
>
> Subject: [Indologie] Internet-Radioprogramme in indischen Sprachen
>
> That's extremely helpful when you go through your inbox. Especially in
> times when the discussion gets out of hands and you'd like to remain
> abstinent for some time (without unsubscribing)...
>
> Greetings (^:
>
> Thomas Anzenhofer





More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list