on zankara's date - 2
vsundaresan at HOTMAIL.COM
Mon Jan 17 17:36:33 UTC 2000
Sudalaimuthu Palaniappan <Palaniappa at AOL.COM> wrote:
>If the name vikramAditya is not really relevant as Vidyasankar says, then a
>ninth century date can satisfy both Cambodian and Tamil data.
I don't think it is irrelevant. I only think it is difficult to zero down
on who exactly this vikramAditya is. I think that efforts to reach a modern
notion of certainty in such matters often tend to be misguided.
More information about the INDOLOGY