Typographical error in the Bhagavad-Gita?

[Martin Gansten]

>Gosh, seems like those who did respond didn't see the obvious flaw, while
>those who do see it won't respond.

I was thinking the same thing...

>As for the reason why
>kshatriyas have not been included with vaishyas and shudras, dare one point
>to the numerous essays on the position of brAhmaNas vs. kshatriyas in Indian
>thought?

Not to mention the fact that brahmanas and kshatriyas (or kings, at least)
are mentioned together in the very next verse: ki.m punar braahma.naa.h
pu.nyaa bhaktaa raajar.sayas tathaa, etc.

Regards,
Martin Gansten