Typographical error in the Bhagavad-Gita?
Martin.Gansten at TEOL.LU.SE
Wed Jan 5 08:27:22 UTC 2000
>Gosh, seems like those who did respond didn't see the obvious flaw, while
>those who do see it won't respond.
I was thinking the same thing...
>As for the reason why
>kshatriyas have not been included with vaishyas and shudras, dare one point
>to the numerous essays on the position of brAhmaNas vs. kshatriyas in Indian
Not to mention the fact that brahmanas and kshatriyas (or kings, at least)
are mentioned together in the very next verse: ki.m punar braahma.naa.h
pu.nyaa bhaktaa raajar.sayas tathaa, etc.
More information about the INDOLOGY