Re. the so-called "double-truth"

[R Srinivasan]

<<fundamentally there is no being.
adding things won't reach it>>

If fundamentally there is no being, then adding things to what and Won't
reach What?


-----Original Message-----
From: Indology [mailto:INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK]On Behalf Of Ven.
Tantra
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 8:10 AM
To: INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK
Subject: Re. the so-called "double-truth"


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jesualdo Correia wrote:


<<...But for the hand be able to clap alone that of
Being is undoubtely the very one which counts.
   VijqAna and PrajqA. Would that be possible to
ontologise these terms in order to adequate things?>>


fundamentally there is no being.
adding things won't reach it


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/