rajarshi.banerjee at SMGINC.COM
Wed Nov 24 00:13:32 UTC 1999
Sorry, big mistake by dentals I meant retroflexes sounded more to the front
ones like rl etc.. I hope people dont get confused.
From: Rajarshi Banerjee [mailto:rajarshi.banerjee at SMGINC.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 6:37 PM
To: INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Wheat
It was pointed out in an earlier mail that there is a retroflexion gradient
from the morthwest to the south, gujarati having very weak retroflexion and
tamil and malayalam being strongly retroflexed.
Words like badA(big) or gaNesh require some retroflexion. All Indian
languages are retroflexed to some degree. I have found punjabi speakers
using retroflexes in words like nAl where. the l is pretty strongly
Everyone must have noticed that dentals are used all over south asia
bangladesh to pak and afghanistan, but dissappear rather abruptly once we
leave south asia.
People from western and central asia, russia and most of europe( excluding
english, german and the like) dont use dentals either. I am no linguist but
I would think that this is a pretty significant divide and an important
marker in determining language drift or evolution. Is there any popular
explanation for this?
More information about the INDOLOGY