[ADMIN] Policy on frequent/voluminous postings
unity5 at EMAIL.MSN.COM
Wed Mar 10 04:08:14 UTC 1999
I too thought it a good idea on first reading. This is my first time to
post, and now I feel reluctant to post at all. I would not want to
over-post and take the risk of being #1 on the list.
I am a moderator on another list. There are actually 3 of us who moderate
the list. This method works well and spreads the duties out.
From: Ramadas <dasa at OZEMAIL.COM.AU>
To: INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK <INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK>
Date: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Policy on frequent/voluminous postings
>On first reading I thought it sounded OK, but then I began to wonder at the
>proposed outcome. It seems to me that whenever a subject which creates a
>great amount of dialogue comes up, it is mainly two or three who jump in
>wholeheartedly. If a restriction is placed on these two or three
>protagonists, then I fear that the quality of debate will fall off and
>will not be very much food for thought flowing through.
>dasa at ozemail.com.au
>From: Dominik Wujastyk <ucgadkw at UCL.AC.UK>
>To: INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK <INDOLOGY at LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK>
>Date: Tuesday, 9 March 1999 12:57
>Subject: [ADMIN] Policy on frequent/voluminous postings
More information about the INDOLOGY