A few more Bhagavad Gita obscurities.

[Harry Spier]

Avinash Sathaye wrote:

>
>Harry Spier wrote:
>
>> Snip..Snip..
>>
>> 3) verse 15.5
>> Belvalkar reads    ...gacchantymUdA...
>> van Buitenen and all other editions at hand read ...gacchantymUdAH...
>> Misprint in Belvalkar?
>>
>
>This time, I am confused about the notation. It appears that the only
>difference is the visarga at the end and my edition does have it
without
>any additional comments. So, it is most likely a  misprint in your
edition!
>
>About the transliteration convention, should it be gacchantyamUDhAH ? I
>mean should there be an "a" after the "y" and the "d" replaced by "Dh"
to
>conform to devnagari? Pardon my ignorance about the HK notation.
>
>

Avinash is quite right, the transliteration should read as he has
indicated above.


Apologies,

Harry Spier




______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com