A few more Bhagavad Gita obscurities.

Harry Spier harryspier at HOTMAIL.COM
Sat Feb 27 19:04:12 UTC 1999

Avinash Sathaye wrote:

>Harry Spier wrote:
>> Snip..Snip..
>> 3) verse 15.5
>> Belvalkar reads    ...gacchantymUdA...
>> van Buitenen and all other editions at hand read ...gacchantymUdAH...
>> Misprint in Belvalkar?
>This time, I am confused about the notation. It appears that the only
>difference is the visarga at the end and my edition does have it
>any additional comments. So, it is most likely a  misprint in your
>About the transliteration convention, should it be gacchantyamUDhAH ? I
>mean should there be an "a" after the "y" and the "d" replaced by "Dh"
>conform to devnagari? Pardon my ignorance about the HK notation.

Avinash is quite right, the transliteration should read as he has
indicated above.


Harry Spier

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list