History of the usage of the terms --"mImAMsa", "vedAnta" and "mAyAvAda"

[Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian]

Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian <ramakris at EROLS.COM> wrote:

> This shabara seems to have written a commentary, as per sha.nkaras
and

Oops, read that as "This *upavasha* seems to have written ..."

> shabaras bhAshhyas, on both the pUrva, i.e., jaiminis sUtra-s
> (mImA.nsA) and uttara (vedAnta) sUtra-s. However, since
shabarasvAmin
> wrote a commentary only on the sUtras of jaimini, I think we can say

Rama