[Rice on Tilak]
Dr.S.Kalyanaraman
kalyan99 at NETSCAPE.NET
Fri Oct 2 00:04:33 UTC 1998
Dehejia wrote: (snip)> > But the more important reason is husked rice, as
opposed to other cereals or lentils, does not sprout. It is beyond growth and
decay and therefore complete, whole.> > Anthropoligically rice is more ancient
than wheat in India. The Dravidian connection cited by you is an interesting
one.(snip)
I request you to refer to the following web pages:
http://sarasvati.simplenet.com/html/ricediffusion.htm
A map detailing the diffusion of black and red ware and rice from
Lothal (2200 BC) to Sonpur (650 BC)attesting to the continuity of the
civilization.
http://sarasvati.simplenet.com/Indian%20Lexicon/rice.htm
A few pages of ancient lexemes of Indian languages related to many
forms of rice. This semantic cluster is one sample from among thousands
of lexical repertoire where the Dravidian/Mundarica etyma and Aryan
etyma coalesce, in a remarkable dialectical continuum from Gujarati to
Bengali, from Nepali to Tamil to Sinhalese.
Best regards,
Kalyanaraman
____________________________________________________________________
More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list