Sloppy Blunder:Re: Perso-Aryan Hypothesis

[Viktor V. Sukliyan]

Dear friends from Indology

I am very sorry for my sloppy blunder of publishing private message from
Prof. John R. Gardner adressed to me personally. Unfortunately I didn't
mention that it came not from Indology Listserv, before saving to folder.
I thought it was written in public, therefore I felt moral responsibility
to reply accordingly to all my respected friends on Indology List, for the
betterment of last.
In no way I wanted to use your sincere letter as a "podium for the for a
diatribe against the participants in the debate".It was just inattentive
emotional reply. Sorry for it. I also apologize for being exposed as
unethical netter before my reverend friends and well-wishers.

Sincerely Yours
Viktor Sukliyan

On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Viktor V. Sukliyan wrote:

> Viktor:
>
> It would have been nice if you'd have replied privately to my original
> post--sent privately to you--as well.  My note was not intended as a
> podium for a diatribe against the participants in the debate.  My
> apologies to all
>
> jrg
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Viktor V. Sukliyan wrote:
>
> > Hello John,
> >
> > You are absolutely right regarding present unhealthy situation on the
> > List,resembling mass bombing of virgins.
> > Current omnivorous moderators just make powerful speeches with purpose to
> > massacre their opponents. If they would have a modicum of sense...
> > It's obvious how modest their means of scholarly argumentation and
> > comprehension.Modulating for the modulating sake.
> > Let us await for a soberly implicatum scholarship.
> >
> > On your 2nd para. I have got some references of people REMOTELY digging
> > in the same direction. If you like I'll supply you with the stuff
> privately.
> >
> > Viktor Sukliyan
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, JR Gardner wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm quite curious as to what sources you base this upon.  I'm very
> > > interested, but I do not get into the internet debate these days b/c
> it is
> > > simply too acrimonious at times-- thuse even intelligent statements get
> > > lost in the clamor of conflict.
> > >
> > > If there are other scholars/sources considering this, please let me knwo.
> > > I may not fully understand you position as some the way in which I
> > > understand english is different from yours, but I think I got the general
> > > idea, and it is intriguing.  I'd like to read more.  Are you the only
> > > person pursuing this?
> > >
> > > jrg
> > >
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > John Robert Gardner      Obermann Center
> > > School of Religion         for Advanced Studies
> > > University of Iowa       University of Iowa
> > > 319-335-2164             319-335-4034
> > > http://vedavid.org     http://www.uiowa.edu/~obermann/
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > It is ludicrous to consider language as anything other
> > > than that of which it is the transformation.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>