Hindi etc.
Narayan S. Raja
raja at galileo.IFA.Hawaii.Edu
Fri Nov 29 23:23:01 UTC 1996
On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, Robert J. Zydenbos wrote:
> (The actual point of
> the discussion is that I am arguing that there is an unhealthy fixation
> in Western academia on Hindi as "the modern language of India" [sic -
> this has actually been written here], with Hindi teachers in the
> Western Indological world institutionally overrepresenting that
> minority language while the majority of historical and contemporary
> India is ignored, irrespective of relative merits in that majority.)
You keep calling Hindi a "minority language" --
which it is (like every other language in
India). But let's beam back to Planet Earth
and look at some numbers:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Population of India (approx) -- 900 million
Population of "Hindi belt" (approx)
(UP+Bihar+MP+Rajasthan+Haryana+HP) -- 280 million
Subtract non-Hindi-speakers, esp. in
Bihar and MP -- - 40 million
Add Hindi-speakers in other parts
of India -- + 50 million (at least)
TOTAL Hindi-speakers 290 million (approx)
%ge of Hindi-speakers in Indian pop. ~~ 33%
Next largest language group in India
(probably Bengali?) ~~ 70 million (approx)
Add Bangladesh ~~ 120 million (approx)
%ge of Bengali-speakers in India ~~ 8%
%ge of Bengali-speakers in subcontinent ~~ 16%
%ge of Telugu-speakers in India ~~ 7%
%ge of Kannada-speakers in India ~~ 6%
%ge of Tamil-speakers in India ~~ 6% (MY LANGUAGE!)
-----------------------------------------------------------
All numbers are approximate (based on my guesstimates),
but close to reality.
Hmmm... seen in this way (33% Hindi-speakers, as
compared with 8% for the next-largest language group
in India), I can easily understand that many foreigners,
if they could pick only one modern Indian language,
would pick Hindi.
Regards,
Raja.
PS: Stay cool, don't get excited. Learning Hindi is not evil.
PPS: I'm a Tamilian, myself.
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list