Official State Languages query
Narayan S. Raja
raja at galileo.IFA.Hawaii.Edu
Tue Aug 20 03:41:31 UTC 1996
On Mon, 19 Aug 1996 gail at utxvms.cc.utexas.edu wrote:
> The important point
> is granting people the *right* to open schools in their own languages.
I'm pretty sure that this is
not an issue at all, i.e., i.e.,
it is perfectly legal, right now,
to start a school and teach in
any language one wants! Whether
that school would be eligible for
govt. subsidies, or whether govt.
subsidies would be available to
print textbooks in that language,
is a different matter. There are
three reasons why I think that this
"right" already exists:
1. I would guess that there is, in
fact, NO LAW that either explicitly
permits, or prohibits, opening a school
in whatever language one chooses --
just as there is probably no law
that explicitly permits, or prohibits,
people from wearing any ethnic clothes
they feel like. I.e., I guess that
just as there is no reason to press for a
law that explicitly permits people to wear
langotis -- the current legal position
presumably being that the law is blind
to langotis -- similarly, there is no
reason to press for a law that explicitly
allows, or disallows, teaching in any language.
2. Further, I would guess that the right to
teach in any language is already
implied by the Fundamental Right
to "freedom of expression". Probably,
this has never been tested in the courts,
for the simple reason that in India,
nobody could care less if you want to
teach, in, say, Albanian, so long as
you don't ask the govt. to pay for it.
3. New States are created, and additional
languages are added to Section no. whatever
of the Constitution, with monotonous
regularity. For example, Nepali and
Konkani were added only recently. I
strongly doubt that Konkani- or Nepali-
medium schools were illegal, or non-existent,
before some politicians in Delhi got
around to adding those languages to the list.
Regards,
Raja.
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list