Etymology of kSatriya
n.rao at rz.uni-sb.de
n.rao at rz.uni-sb.de
Fri Oct 13 20:56:53 UTC 1995
>
>DR.S.KALYANARAMAN said:
>> If we keep quoting sentences,
>> we will end up writing books for each morpheme.
>
>Yes. I consider C. S. Lewis's _Studies in Words_ to be one of the
>finest such books, for example. For me, this is the linguistic
>equivalent of Geertz's "thick description" in social anthropology. It
>would be marvellous to have such subtle and searching studies for
>Sanskrit words and concepts. Of course quite a lot has been done: I
>think immediately of van Buitenen's fine studies of "citta", "ahankara"
>and related words.
>
>Dominik
Dear Dominik,
can you please give me this reference to the study of "citta" and
"ahamkAra"? When you are at it, you mentioned recently your
interest in the history of science in South Asia.
Is there some good book written recently that you can suggest?
More generally, can Indology members suggest introductory
books on themes and concepts found in Samkhya that can be used
for Philosophy introductory courses? I am looking for
(Analytic Philodophy style)conceptual
elucidations on conepts like "Buddhi", "ParinAma", "jIva" etc. Though
I studied Indian Philosophy back in 70s in India, it was of a very very
elementary nature, and since then my acquaintance with books on
Indian Philosophy are of chance encounters. Though I have come across
some text books written specifically for American College courses,
they appear to me more of the nature of general introduction to Indian
civilization rather than on the conceptual specificities of Indian Traditions.
My intention to look into Indian philosophy is the following: I surmise
that possibilities of alternative types of conceptualising the human faculties
can be found in concepts like "Buddhi" - which is not the same as the notion of
"intellect" or "reason" as found in the Aristotelian and Modern philosophical
traditions.
If possible, I want to combine my study with the teaching obligations I have.
In German Universities, a course is constitued by a weekly session of a
hour and a half for 13 to 14 weeks. The course is generally through
reading the texts and discussing it. I am wondering whether reading
the sAmkhya kArikA (of course, in translation) together
along with commentaries and secondary texts would be an option.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance to all those who are willing to help.
Dr. B. Narahari Rao
F.R. 5.1. Philosophie
Unversitaet des Saarlandes,
Postfach 15 11 50,
D-66041 Saarbrücken
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list