SARVANGI OF GOPALDAS

[Peter D Banos]

On Mon, 12 Jun 1995, ALLEN W THRASHER wrote:

>           "The Sarvangi  of Gopaldas; a  17th  century anthology of  Bhakti 
>           literature" was published by Manohar in Delhi  in  1993.  What  I 
>           assume is the same book, "The Sarvangi of  the Dadupanthi Rajab," 

No, I believe they are two different "Sarvangis," by different compilers, 
both within the Dadupanth tradition and so of course with a similar 
framework and contents.
Moreover, if I remember correctly Callewaert's Rajab book didn't include 
the whole Sarvangi, but only the parts attributed to Dadu. Or some such 
selection. It's been a while since I looked at it...
The Gopaldas I have at home, having bought a copy from Gerry Barrier at 
Madison a couple of years ago; the Rajjab is here in the CU 
library and I think I'll go have a look at it. I'll 
report back in a few hours if I find I've misrepresented it.
							-Peter D. Banos
							pdb1 at columbia.edu
 


> From THRASHER at MAIL.LOC.GOV 13 1995 Jun EST 16:00:16
Date: 13 Jun 1995 16:00:16 EST
Reply-To: THRASHER <THRASHER at MAIL.LOC.GOV>
From: ALLEN W THRASHER <THRASHER at MAIL.LOC.GOV>
Subject: SUBHADRAHARANAM

          The Library of Congress's copy of  the following title is heavily 
          damaged on the last page (27-28): 
           
          81-907110 
          PK3798 .M182 S87 1936 (Orien Sans) 
          Madhvabhatta, fl. 1610 
          Subhadraharanam 
          Trtiyavrttih 
          Mumbayyam: Nirnayasagarakhyamudranalaye, 1936 
          Kavyamala, 9 
           
          Could someone supply me with a photocopy of the damaged pages? 
           
          Thanks, 
           
           
           
          Allen W. Thrasher 
          Senior Reference Librarian 
          Southern Asia Section 
          Library of Congress 
          Washington, DC 20540-4744 
          tel. (202) 707-5600 
          fax  (202) 707-1724 
          Internet: thrasher at mail.loc.gov 
           
          Any opinions expressed are mine and  not those of  the Library of 
          Congress or its management.