Review of INDOLOGY (III of III)

[Chris Wooff]

Repost
 
> The message is included below:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >From magier at columbia.edu
> Received: from sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu by mail.liv.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
>           Fri, 13 Jan 1995 11:35:10 +0000
> Received: by sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu id AA07614  (5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK 
>           for indology at liverpool.ac.uk); Fri, 13 Jan 1995 06:35:04 -0500
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 6:35:02 EST
> From: David Magier <magier at columbia.edu>
> To: indology at liverpool.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: Review of INDOLOGY (III of III)
> In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 13 Jan 1995 01:49:38 GMT
> Message-Id: <CMM.0.90.4.789996902.magier at sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu>
> 
> Dominik,
> thanks for putting it all so clearly. I agree with you wholeheartedly
> and applaud and cherish INDOLOGY (far above many other supposedly
> scholarly listservs) precisely because it has been (mostly) able to
> maintain this kind of clarity and focus and seriousness of purpose. I
> know the vast majority of our indological colleagues will agree with
> you as well, and will rally to your effort to keep this group to its
> intended purpose.       David Magier
>  
>