Martin Gansten Martin.Gansten at TEOL.LU.SE
Sat Mar 23 02:31:11 EST 2002

>I tried, with my pancanga program, the year before (AD 1502) thinking of
>the possiblity of the year number as current instead of expired or it is
>Karttikaadi instead of Caitraadi, but the weekday did not fit.
>I do not understand how Virakma 1560 corresponds to AD 1504.
>I wonder whether it is really Vikrama Samvat.

Yes. The original posting did not specify the era. What about the
possibility of error in the author's calculations of tithis? I am not very
familiar with the ganita side of classical jyotisha.

Martin Gansten

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list