Q: Historical Tamil syntax
smadhuresan at YAHOO.COM
Thu Apr 12 10:26:32 EDT 2001
Grammarians use another famous sentence:
"eRumpu muTTaikoNTu tiTTai ERin2 mazai peytatu."
Here, even though "peytatu" denotes past, it actually
means the future - "it's going to rain".
It's like someone saying in March 2000, "NASDAQ/DotCom
stocks crashed" if (s)he was sure.
--- Venkatraman Iyer <venkatraman_iyer at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> "avar nalla uyaramaay iruntaar" sounds real strange;
> Does it not imply? :, "ippOtu avar uyaramaay illai"
> Using present tense for past occurences is called
> "kAla vazuvamaiti". I think you can find it in na_n_nUl grammar
> some examples. "nA_n iLamaiyil viLaiyATuvatu intap paLLit tiNNai." etc
> tiNai vazuvamaiti eg., calling the daughter: "vATA, vATA! kaTaikkup
> pOkalAm." etc. iTa vazuvamaiti is there too.
> Vidyanath Rao wrote:
> I would like to know how far back we can trace the following usage in
> Modern Tamil: The "future" form (historically derived from the
> non-past) is also used in case of states considered to be intrinsic
> or permanent, even if the referent is not alive. For example,
> 1) avar nalla uyaramaay iruppaar
> He was quite tall. [In English, 'was' is required if the
> referent is dead.]
> 2) madurai maNi iyer na_nRaaka shaNmugapriyaa paaDuvaar.
> Madurai Mani Iyer was good at singing Shanmugapriya.
> It does not seem easy to find examples of such situations from the
> oldest Tamil texts. Whether a given form is considered a participle
> or a finite verb also seems to vary with the authority consulted,
> making it harder to classify a given sentence as nominal or not.
> [These cannot be waved away as historical presents. Use of past forms
> here change the meaning: saying paaDi_naar in 2) makes it seem to
> refer to a specific concert; saying iruntaar in 1) sounds strange.]
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
More information about the INDOLOGY