Analogies,valid and invalid (was Re: Scenario of language replacement)
vsundaresan at HOTMAIL.COM
Fri Nov 10 14:48:38 EST 2000
>I think we would all like to see more rigour in the discussion. To
>that end, please do the following: instead of making vague, sweeping
>assertions ("Indologists vehemently claim...", "it is said that...",
>etc), please cite references to specific writings by specific
Check the archives, there are tons of material. Re: flogging
dead horses, read the Frontline issue dated October 13, 2000.
I thought this should be obvious to anybody on this list, and
in the interests of brevity, didn't provide a long list of
But I must say that I am glad to see you posting here. If nothing
else, it will prove my point, that people with Indian names need
not all be stereotyped into one category.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
More information about the INDOLOGY