Is "Sanskrit" Dravidian?

George Thompson thompson at JLC.NET
Fri Jun 11 09:58:34 EDT 1999


Hello Ganesan,

I don't have Masica's article at hand. The full reference is:

Colin Masica: "Aryan and non-Aryan elements in north Indian agriculture",
in *Aryan and non-Aryan in India*, 1970 [Univ. Michigan, ed. Deshpande and
Hook]. 

It is a long detailed article.

Also, if you have not seen it, you'll find this useful:

Franklin Southworth: "Ancient economic plants of South Asia", in *Languages
and Cultures: Studies in Honor of Edgar C. Polomé*, 1988 [Trends in
Linguistics Monograph 36, ed. M.A. Jazayery & W. Winter].

George 

At 03:17 PM 6/10/1999 PDT, you wrote:
><<<
>It is good that you pointed this out. What I said here is wrong.
>I meant that one third *of foreign words* in Hindi cannot be
>attributed to Dravidian or Munda, but rather to this language x.
>I did not mean one third of all Hindi words.
>
>These borrowed terms tend to be agricultural terms, by the way.
>>>>
>
>Dear George,
>
>Is there a word list of the agricultural terms
>that Masica talks about?
>
>Thanks,
>N. Ganesan
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>
>



More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list